Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks

This study aims to explore Limited English Language Proficiency (LEP) learners’ meaning negotiation in communicative tasks. In particular, the frequency of meaning negotiation (MN), types and frequency of MN trigger as well as participants’ perceptions of the communicative tasks in relation to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chui, Catherine Lam Nguoi, Azian Abd Aziz @ Ahmad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM 2015
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9077/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9077/1/9346-27917-1-PB.pdf
_version_ 1848811977329082368
author Chui, Catherine Lam Nguoi
Azian Abd Aziz @ Ahmad,
author_facet Chui, Catherine Lam Nguoi
Azian Abd Aziz @ Ahmad,
author_sort Chui, Catherine Lam Nguoi
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study aims to explore Limited English Language Proficiency (LEP) learners’ meaning negotiation in communicative tasks. In particular, the frequency of meaning negotiation (MN), types and frequency of MN trigger as well as participants’ perceptions of the communicative tasks in relation to their L2 language development were explored. A total number of 8 participants were engaged in both open and closed communicative tasks designed for the purpose of this study. Data from stimulated recall interviews and structured interviews were used to consolidate the primary data. It was found that the closed communicative task can yield greater meaning negotiation compared to open communicative task. Meaning negotiation in closed communicative task was mainly triggered by task complexity and lexical difficulties, which might be due to the task design. Meanwhile, meaning negotiation in the open communicative task was mainly caused by the delivery of vague message. It was found that meaning negotiation can be a potential platform to facilitate language development among learners, particularly through clarification requests which can create the linguistic urgency to push LEP learners to expand their interlanguage. Thus, ESL teachers might want to equip LEP learners with effective meaning negotiation strategies, particularly clarification requests, to better equip these learners with the skills to modify their language output during communicative tasks.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T23:54:58Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:9077
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T23:54:58Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:90772016-12-14T06:48:54Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9077/ Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks Chui, Catherine Lam Nguoi Azian Abd Aziz @ Ahmad, This study aims to explore Limited English Language Proficiency (LEP) learners’ meaning negotiation in communicative tasks. In particular, the frequency of meaning negotiation (MN), types and frequency of MN trigger as well as participants’ perceptions of the communicative tasks in relation to their L2 language development were explored. A total number of 8 participants were engaged in both open and closed communicative tasks designed for the purpose of this study. Data from stimulated recall interviews and structured interviews were used to consolidate the primary data. It was found that the closed communicative task can yield greater meaning negotiation compared to open communicative task. Meaning negotiation in closed communicative task was mainly triggered by task complexity and lexical difficulties, which might be due to the task design. Meanwhile, meaning negotiation in the open communicative task was mainly caused by the delivery of vague message. It was found that meaning negotiation can be a potential platform to facilitate language development among learners, particularly through clarification requests which can create the linguistic urgency to push LEP learners to expand their interlanguage. Thus, ESL teachers might want to equip LEP learners with effective meaning negotiation strategies, particularly clarification requests, to better equip these learners with the skills to modify their language output during communicative tasks. Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9077/1/9346-27917-1-PB.pdf Chui, Catherine Lam Nguoi and Azian Abd Aziz @ Ahmad, (2015) Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks. 3L; Language,Linguistics and Literature,The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 21 (3). pp. 175-190. ISSN 0128-5157 http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l
spellingShingle Chui, Catherine Lam Nguoi
Azian Abd Aziz @ Ahmad,
Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks
title Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks
title_full Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks
title_fullStr Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks
title_full_unstemmed Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks
title_short Meaning negotiation of LEP learners in communicative tasks
title_sort meaning negotiation of lep learners in communicative tasks
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9077/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9077/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9077/1/9346-27917-1-PB.pdf