An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India

Introduction: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of Diethyl Carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rohit, Trivedi, Sandeep, Singh, Paharam, Adhikari, Sukhendra, Pratap Singh, Manoj, Saxena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2015
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/1/vol_5_no_1_2015_69_%281%29.pdf
_version_ 1848811897388793856
author Rohit, Trivedi,
Sandeep, Singh
Paharam, Adhikari
Sukhendra, Pratap Singh
Manoj, Saxena
author_facet Rohit, Trivedi,
Sandeep, Singh
Paharam, Adhikari
Sukhendra, Pratap Singh
Manoj, Saxena
author_sort Rohit, Trivedi,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Introduction: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of Diethyl Carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. To study the coverage and compliance of MDA in Satna district during the campaign in June 2013. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Urban And Rural Areas In Satna District Identified As Endemic For Filariasis Where MDA 2013 Was Undertaken. Study Variables: Exploratory - Rural and urban clusters of Satna district; Outcome - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects. Results: Four clusters, each comprising 30 households from the Satna endemic district, yielded an eligible population of 650 (95.87%) of total 678. The coverage was 586 (90.15% out of eligible population) with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 88.05% with a gap of 11.95% to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (79.38%) was below the target (85%). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific. Conclusions: Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T23:53:42Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:8829
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T23:53:42Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:88292016-12-14T06:48:10Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/ An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India Rohit, Trivedi, Sandeep, Singh Paharam, Adhikari Sukhendra, Pratap Singh Manoj, Saxena Introduction: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of Diethyl Carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. To study the coverage and compliance of MDA in Satna district during the campaign in June 2013. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Urban And Rural Areas In Satna District Identified As Endemic For Filariasis Where MDA 2013 Was Undertaken. Study Variables: Exploratory - Rural and urban clusters of Satna district; Outcome - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects. Results: Four clusters, each comprising 30 households from the Satna endemic district, yielded an eligible population of 650 (95.87%) of total 678. The coverage was 586 (90.15% out of eligible population) with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 88.05% with a gap of 11.95% to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (79.38%) was below the target (85%). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific. Conclusions: Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2015-06-19 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/1/vol_5_no_1_2015_69_%281%29.pdf Rohit, Trivedi, and Sandeep, Singh and Paharam, Adhikari and Sukhendra, Pratap Singh and Manoj, Saxena (2015) An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Public Health Research, 5 (1). pp. 538-542. ISSN 2232-0245 www.ijphr.ukm.my
spellingShingle Rohit, Trivedi,
Sandeep, Singh
Paharam, Adhikari
Sukhendra, Pratap Singh
Manoj, Saxena
An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India
title An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India
title_full An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India
title_fullStr An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India
title_short An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India
title_sort evaluation of compliance of mass drug administration (mda) against lymphatic filariasis of satna district of madhya pradesh, india
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/1/vol_5_no_1_2015_69_%281%29.pdf