Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’

The discourse on ethnic identity is a modern phenomenon. It came along with colonialism, in particular the construction of ‘colonial knowledge’ necessary for purposes of colonial ru,e. The creation of a ‘plural society’ in British Malaya provided the ‘epistemological basis and space’ not only for di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shamsul A.B.
Format: Article
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1999
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/
_version_ 1848810428167094272
author Shamsul A.B.,
author_facet Shamsul A.B.,
author_sort Shamsul A.B.,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The discourse on ethnic identity is a modern phenomenon. It came along with colonialism, in particular the construction of ‘colonial knowledge’ necessary for purposes of colonial ru,e. The creation of a ‘plural society’ in British Malaya provided the ‘epistemological basis and space’ not only for discourse on ethnic identities but also the assification of ethnic categories into lived reality, be it in the ‘authority-defined’ context as well as the ‘everyday defined’ context. This essay traces the historical trajectory of the construction of Malaysia’s two major ethnic groups, namely, Malay and Chinese, as well as what constitutes “Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. It also offers a brief comparative commentary on the latter.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T23:30:21Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:4166
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T23:30:21Z
publishDate 1999
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:41662012-05-23T07:41:57Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/ Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’ Shamsul A.B., The discourse on ethnic identity is a modern phenomenon. It came along with colonialism, in particular the construction of ‘colonial knowledge’ necessary for purposes of colonial ru,e. The creation of a ‘plural society’ in British Malaya provided the ‘epistemological basis and space’ not only for discourse on ethnic identities but also the assification of ethnic categories into lived reality, be it in the ‘authority-defined’ context as well as the ‘everyday defined’ context. This essay traces the historical trajectory of the construction of Malaysia’s two major ethnic groups, namely, Malay and Chinese, as well as what constitutes “Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. It also offers a brief comparative commentary on the latter. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1999-07 Article PeerReviewed Shamsul A.B., (1999) Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. AKADEMIKA, 55 . pp. 17-37. ISSN 0126-5008 http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/penerbit/jdem55-01.html
spellingShingle Shamsul A.B.,
Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_full Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_fullStr Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_full_unstemmed Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_short Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_sort identity contestation in malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘malayness’ and ‘chineseness’
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/