A cross-linguistic study of motion event acquisition in Japanese and Chinese: through the lens of figure and ground components
Numerous cross-linguistic studies on motion events have been undertaken to test the thinking-for speaking hypothesis, with a remarkable lead over the Path and Manner components. Yet, unexpectedly, the core entities in motion events such as Figure and Ground have garnered relatively limited focu...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2025
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25952/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25952/1/Gema_25_1_1.pdf |
| Summary: | Numerous cross-linguistic studies on motion events have been undertaken to test the thinking-for
speaking hypothesis, with a remarkable lead over the Path and Manner components. Yet,
unexpectedly, the core entities in motion events such as Figure and Ground have garnered
relatively limited focus. The current study shifts the focus to examine the way how subjects encode
the Figure and Ground information through a narrative task, involving Chinese learners who learn
Japanese as their foreign language (JFL), Chinese native speakers, and Japanese native speakers.
The results revealed that the typological framework is too narrow to explain observed linguistic
variations in the acquisition process. The striking differences followed from syntactic structure
variations in the utterances of how Japanese versus Chinese encode the Figure and Ground
information, which suggest the joint impact of typological and syntactic factors on language
acquisition. In addition, it is clearly shown that the JFL learners patterned to a large degree with
the Japanese native speakers rather than the Chinese native speakers concerning the distribution
of Figure and Ground information by motion event type. This means that to some extent the JFL
learners have acquired the target-like way to report Figure and Ground information in the narrative
task, showing a limited role of the L1 thinking for speaking patterns. |
|---|