Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach

This paper examines the dialectics of victimhood and the associated liability for war atrocities in David Abrams’s Fobbit and Sinan Antoon’s The Corpse Washer. It contrasts the perspectives of Abrams, an American veteran of the 2003 war in Iraq, with Antoon, an Iraqi civilian, shedding light on thei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Alosman, M. Ikbal, Raihanah, M. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25425/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25425/1/TD%206.pdf
_version_ 1848816355116056576
author M. Alosman, M. Ikbal
Raihanah, M. M.
author_facet M. Alosman, M. Ikbal
Raihanah, M. M.
author_sort M. Alosman, M. Ikbal
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper examines the dialectics of victimhood and the associated liability for war atrocities in David Abrams’s Fobbit and Sinan Antoon’s The Corpse Washer. It contrasts the perspectives of Abrams, an American veteran of the 2003 war in Iraq, with Antoon, an Iraqi civilian, shedding light on their differing portrayals of the American-led invasion. Victimhood serves as a central theme in war narratives, providing both justification for violence and a means to absolve aggressors of accountability for subsequent atrocities. This study explores the intricate interplay between self-perceived victimhood and narrative construction in the context of the Iraq War. The methodology focuses on concepts of victimhood, the psychological impact of war, and the assertion of narrative ownership. The findings illustrate that while Abrams’s narrative adopts an outsider perspective and portrays Americans as the most visible victims—often absolving them of complicity—Antoon’s work presents an insider perspective that emphasizes the profound humiliation intertwined with death in Iraq. In The Corpse Washer, death transcends mere grief, becoming a symbolic representation of the enduring suffering and degradation faced by the Iraqi people, thereby framing American presence as a source of relentless destruction and moral conflict. This perspective challenges readers to confront the complexities of war, emphasizing the moral implications of foreign intervention and the profound costs borne by the Iraqi people.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T01:04:33Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:25425
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T01:04:33Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:254252025-06-23T03:09:05Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25425/ Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach M. Alosman, M. Ikbal Raihanah, M. M. This paper examines the dialectics of victimhood and the associated liability for war atrocities in David Abrams’s Fobbit and Sinan Antoon’s The Corpse Washer. It contrasts the perspectives of Abrams, an American veteran of the 2003 war in Iraq, with Antoon, an Iraqi civilian, shedding light on their differing portrayals of the American-led invasion. Victimhood serves as a central theme in war narratives, providing both justification for violence and a means to absolve aggressors of accountability for subsequent atrocities. This study explores the intricate interplay between self-perceived victimhood and narrative construction in the context of the Iraq War. The methodology focuses on concepts of victimhood, the psychological impact of war, and the assertion of narrative ownership. The findings illustrate that while Abrams’s narrative adopts an outsider perspective and portrays Americans as the most visible victims—often absolving them of complicity—Antoon’s work presents an insider perspective that emphasizes the profound humiliation intertwined with death in Iraq. In The Corpse Washer, death transcends mere grief, becoming a symbolic representation of the enduring suffering and degradation faced by the Iraqi people, thereby framing American presence as a source of relentless destruction and moral conflict. This perspective challenges readers to confront the complexities of war, emphasizing the moral implications of foreign intervention and the profound costs borne by the Iraqi people. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25425/1/TD%206.pdf M. Alosman, M. Ikbal and Raihanah, M. M. (2024) Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach. 3L; Language,Linguistics and Literature,The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 30 (4). pp. 74-86. ISSN 0128-5157 https://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/1778
spellingShingle M. Alosman, M. Ikbal
Raihanah, M. M.
Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach
title Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach
title_full Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach
title_fullStr Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach
title_full_unstemmed Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach
title_short Clashing dialectics of victimhood in Iraq War narratives: a comparative approach
title_sort clashing dialectics of victimhood in iraq war narratives: a comparative approach
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25425/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25425/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25425/1/TD%206.pdf