Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards

In the discourse of human rights, tension emerged from the full involvement of the Western countries led by the United States of America “USA” in the 2004 constitution of Afghanistan “The 2004 Constitution”. It focuses on human rights under Shariah and international standards without unifying confli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhibullah Faizan, Noor Shuhadawati Mohamad Amin, Mohammad Tahir Sabit Haji Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2025
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25339/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25339/1/227_237%20Human%20Rights%20Conflicts%20in%20Afghan%202004.pdf
_version_ 1848816330832084992
author Muhibullah Faizan,
Noor Shuhadawati Mohamad Amin,
Mohammad Tahir Sabit Haji Mohammad,
author_facet Muhibullah Faizan,
Noor Shuhadawati Mohamad Amin,
Mohammad Tahir Sabit Haji Mohammad,
author_sort Muhibullah Faizan,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In the discourse of human rights, tension emerged from the full involvement of the Western countries led by the United States of America “USA” in the 2004 constitution of Afghanistan “The 2004 Constitution”. It focuses on human rights under Shariah and international standards without unifying conflicting ideas after the Bonn Agreement of 2001. Hence, human rights are considered a subject of controversy among Afghan legal experts, law enforcement authorities and international community. It led to the lack of the rule of law due to constitutional duality. To fulfil the legal gap, this research seeks to discover the real position of human rights by evaluating the tension between legal provisions on Shariah and international human rights standards in the 2004 constitution. The research employs the doctrinal method of textual analysis and coordinated constitutional interpretation to discover the opposing areas of human rights under the Shariah and international standards. The researcher examined the legal status of human rights under constitutional provisions on Shariah and international human rights instruments which are introduced as conflicting sources of law for fundamental human rights, particularly about religious freedom and gender equality. Additionally, the 2004 constitution weakens the position of Shariah by restricting the meaning of law which does not contain the constitution itself, and by considering the provisions of international human rights instruments to be equated to the constitutional provision in ranking. However, the 2004 constitution prefers international human rights instruments to Shariah in the case of conflict either in legislation or in the judiciary.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T01:04:10Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:25339
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T01:04:10Z
publishDate 2025
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:253392025-06-13T06:53:49Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25339/ Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards Muhibullah Faizan, Noor Shuhadawati Mohamad Amin, Mohammad Tahir Sabit Haji Mohammad, In the discourse of human rights, tension emerged from the full involvement of the Western countries led by the United States of America “USA” in the 2004 constitution of Afghanistan “The 2004 Constitution”. It focuses on human rights under Shariah and international standards without unifying conflicting ideas after the Bonn Agreement of 2001. Hence, human rights are considered a subject of controversy among Afghan legal experts, law enforcement authorities and international community. It led to the lack of the rule of law due to constitutional duality. To fulfil the legal gap, this research seeks to discover the real position of human rights by evaluating the tension between legal provisions on Shariah and international human rights standards in the 2004 constitution. The research employs the doctrinal method of textual analysis and coordinated constitutional interpretation to discover the opposing areas of human rights under the Shariah and international standards. The researcher examined the legal status of human rights under constitutional provisions on Shariah and international human rights instruments which are introduced as conflicting sources of law for fundamental human rights, particularly about religious freedom and gender equality. Additionally, the 2004 constitution weakens the position of Shariah by restricting the meaning of law which does not contain the constitution itself, and by considering the provisions of international human rights instruments to be equated to the constitutional provision in ranking. However, the 2004 constitution prefers international human rights instruments to Shariah in the case of conflict either in legislation or in the judiciary. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2025-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25339/1/227_237%20Human%20Rights%20Conflicts%20in%20Afghan%202004.pdf Muhibullah Faizan, and Noor Shuhadawati Mohamad Amin, and Mohammad Tahir Sabit Haji Mohammad, (2025) Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards. e-Bangi Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 22 (1). pp. 227-237. ISSN 1823-884x http://ejournal.ukm.my/ebangi/index
spellingShingle Muhibullah Faizan,
Noor Shuhadawati Mohamad Amin,
Mohammad Tahir Sabit Haji Mohammad,
Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards
title Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards
title_full Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards
title_fullStr Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards
title_full_unstemmed Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards
title_short Human rights conflicts in Afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards
title_sort human rights conflicts in afghan 2004 constitution: shariah vs. international standards
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25339/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25339/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/25339/1/227_237%20Human%20Rights%20Conflicts%20in%20Afghan%202004.pdf