Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case

Political rhetoric plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse and perceptions of corruption. The way in which the public perceives corruption and values anti-corruption rhetoric can significantly affect their trust in political institutions and inclinations towards politicians. Thus, ant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Syaza Fuhat, Juliana Abdul Wahab
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24635/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24635/1/Gema%20Online_24_3_5.pdf
_version_ 1848816145546608640
author Syaza Fuhat,
Juliana Abdul Wahab,
author_facet Syaza Fuhat,
Juliana Abdul Wahab,
author_sort Syaza Fuhat,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Political rhetoric plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse and perceptions of corruption. The way in which the public perceives corruption and values anti-corruption rhetoric can significantly affect their trust in political institutions and inclinations towards politicians. Thus, anti-corruption rhetoric has been recognised as a strategic tool for political parties during elections. Nonetheless, there is a recorded tension between rhetoric’s ethical and political dimensions, particularly in corrupt regimes where political rhetoric may serve various purposes. This study critically examines the rhetorical strategies employed by Najib Razak in response to his corruption allegations and the court’s verdict, thereby addressing a gap in the literature on political rhetoric within legal challenges. Through a qualitative content analysis of 21 news broadcasts from ASTRO Awani, the study applies Aristotle’s triadic model of persuasion—ethos, pathos, and logos. The findings indicate that Najib predominantly relies on logos and pathos, strategically leveraging logical reasoning and emotional appeal while minimising the use of ethos¾ethical credibility. This selective use of rhetorical strategies suggests a deliberate effort to influence public perception amid legal challenges. The study highlights the ethical concerns surrounding such rhetorical practices, particularly in democratic contexts where public trust and legal accountability are crucial. By critically analysing Najib’s rhetoric, this study contributes to a broader understanding of the intricate relationship between rhetoric, political legitimacy, and public perception, emphasising the need to scrutinise political discourse in corruption-related contexts.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T01:01:13Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:24635
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T01:01:13Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:246352025-01-02T03:10:26Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24635/ Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case Syaza Fuhat, Juliana Abdul Wahab, Political rhetoric plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse and perceptions of corruption. The way in which the public perceives corruption and values anti-corruption rhetoric can significantly affect their trust in political institutions and inclinations towards politicians. Thus, anti-corruption rhetoric has been recognised as a strategic tool for political parties during elections. Nonetheless, there is a recorded tension between rhetoric’s ethical and political dimensions, particularly in corrupt regimes where political rhetoric may serve various purposes. This study critically examines the rhetorical strategies employed by Najib Razak in response to his corruption allegations and the court’s verdict, thereby addressing a gap in the literature on political rhetoric within legal challenges. Through a qualitative content analysis of 21 news broadcasts from ASTRO Awani, the study applies Aristotle’s triadic model of persuasion—ethos, pathos, and logos. The findings indicate that Najib predominantly relies on logos and pathos, strategically leveraging logical reasoning and emotional appeal while minimising the use of ethos¾ethical credibility. This selective use of rhetorical strategies suggests a deliberate effort to influence public perception amid legal challenges. The study highlights the ethical concerns surrounding such rhetorical practices, particularly in democratic contexts where public trust and legal accountability are crucial. By critically analysing Najib’s rhetoric, this study contributes to a broader understanding of the intricate relationship between rhetoric, political legitimacy, and public perception, emphasising the need to scrutinise political discourse in corruption-related contexts. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24635/1/Gema%20Online_24_3_5.pdf Syaza Fuhat, and Juliana Abdul Wahab, (2024) Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 24 (3). pp. 73-92. ISSN 1675-8021 https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1733
spellingShingle Syaza Fuhat,
Juliana Abdul Wahab,
Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case
title Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case
title_full Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case
title_fullStr Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case
title_full_unstemmed Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case
title_short Rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into Najib Razak’s corruption case
title_sort rhetoric on trial: an aristotelian insight into najib razak’s corruption case
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24635/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24635/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/24635/1/Gema%20Online_24_3_5.pdf