The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions

This article explores the ambiguities and contradictions of a prose narrative depicting a war in Indonesia. Generally known among the Makassarese as Sinrilikna Kappalak Tallumbatua or The Three Ships, the text used in the analysis is its 1993 published version in both Makassarese and Bahasa Indonesi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ivie Carbon Esteban
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2010
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2437/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2437/1/Sari_28%281%29_2010_6_Ivie_%28Final%29.pdf
_version_ 1848809866229972992
author Ivie Carbon Esteban,
author_facet Ivie Carbon Esteban,
author_sort Ivie Carbon Esteban,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This article explores the ambiguities and contradictions of a prose narrative depicting a war in Indonesia. Generally known among the Makassarese as Sinrilikna Kappalak Tallumbatua or The Three Ships, the text used in the analysis is its 1993 published version in both Makassarese and Bahasa Indonesia. For the Makassarese, the Sinrilikna Kappalak Tallumbatua (SKT) is their version of the Makassar War (1666-1669) launched by Gowa against the Vereegnigde Oostindische Compagnie (VOC). This claim presupposes that there is another text and that the Makassarese have the right to insist their own version of the war. I argue that the SKT is not a historical text of the Makassar War, but a literary artifact of narrative fragments about the kingdom of Gowa and its 16th ruler, Sultan Hasanuddin. These fragments are products of selective memory because tradition dictates what is worth recollecting from the past and historical imagination shapes how greatness and heroism are deconstructed to preserve unity among peoples who come from the same lineage of “white blood”. Because the past is so remote, the narrator or composer of the SKT uses fragmentary recollection as a device in reconstructing the events and characters associated with the kingdom of Gowa and the Makassar War. The narrative of such recollection results in ambiguities and contradictions when “new” knowledge intervenes through contemporarization and historical allusion
first_indexed 2025-11-14T23:21:25Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:2437
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T23:21:25Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:24372016-12-14T06:31:36Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2437/ The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions Ivie Carbon Esteban, This article explores the ambiguities and contradictions of a prose narrative depicting a war in Indonesia. Generally known among the Makassarese as Sinrilikna Kappalak Tallumbatua or The Three Ships, the text used in the analysis is its 1993 published version in both Makassarese and Bahasa Indonesia. For the Makassarese, the Sinrilikna Kappalak Tallumbatua (SKT) is their version of the Makassar War (1666-1669) launched by Gowa against the Vereegnigde Oostindische Compagnie (VOC). This claim presupposes that there is another text and that the Makassarese have the right to insist their own version of the war. I argue that the SKT is not a historical text of the Makassar War, but a literary artifact of narrative fragments about the kingdom of Gowa and its 16th ruler, Sultan Hasanuddin. These fragments are products of selective memory because tradition dictates what is worth recollecting from the past and historical imagination shapes how greatness and heroism are deconstructed to preserve unity among peoples who come from the same lineage of “white blood”. Because the past is so remote, the narrator or composer of the SKT uses fragmentary recollection as a device in reconstructing the events and characters associated with the kingdom of Gowa and the Makassar War. The narrative of such recollection results in ambiguities and contradictions when “new” knowledge intervenes through contemporarization and historical allusion Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2010 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2437/1/Sari_28%281%29_2010_6_Ivie_%28Final%29.pdf Ivie Carbon Esteban, (2010) The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions. SARI: Jurnal Alam dan Tamadun Melayu, 28 (1). pp. 129-149. ISSN 0127-2721 http://www.ukm.my/sari/index.html
spellingShingle Ivie Carbon Esteban,
The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions
title The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions
title_full The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions
title_fullStr The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions
title_full_unstemmed The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions
title_short The narrative of war in Makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions
title_sort narrative of war in makassar: its ambiguities and contradictions
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2437/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2437/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/2437/1/Sari_28%281%29_2010_6_Ivie_%28Final%29.pdf