Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines"

The spread of misinformation is a growing concern in today's digital age. The Vlog by Russel Brand titled "The Truth about Pfizer's Vaccines" features various claims about the safety and efficacy of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. The study sought to answer the question, “How doe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Valdez, Renalyn, A. Palagtiw, Diondy, T. Sacueza, Donnie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23851/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23851/13/komunikasi_27.pdf
_version_ 1848815951038906368
author J. Valdez, Renalyn
A. Palagtiw, Diondy
T. Sacueza, Donnie
author_facet J. Valdez, Renalyn
A. Palagtiw, Diondy
T. Sacueza, Donnie
author_sort J. Valdez, Renalyn
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The spread of misinformation is a growing concern in today's digital age. The Vlog by Russel Brand titled "The Truth about Pfizer's Vaccines" features various claims about the safety and efficacy of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. The study sought to answer the question, “How does the Vlog “The Truth about Pfizer’s Vaccines” constructed for public understanding and engagement?” The study used Kenneth Burke’s Dramatism Theory to examine the arguments in Russel Brand’s Vlog. It analyzed both stated and implied messages and made an in-depth look at the underlying reasons and purpose of such messages and meaning-making. In this study, Brand’s Vlog on Pfizer’s vaccines was examined using Burke’s Pentad. The study used a qualitative design with Textual Analysis as a tool. Concepts of construction, understanding, and engagement were examined using Dramatic Pentad while understanding and engagement were analyzed using Identification and Guilt. The Vlog “The Truth about Pfizer’s Vaccines” was constructed for public awareness and engagement, not so much for understanding. The Vlog emphasized the possible conspiracy between academic scientists and pharmaceutical giants. It, however, failed to provide an understanding as to how the system operates given the health crisis, professional and ethical standards of industries and communities involved, and policies, programs, and regulations both in the private and public sectors. Overall, Brand’s Vlog appealed to the public with this formula: Keep the discussion simple, center on the message by repetition, and target the public’s emotions.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T00:58:08Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:23851
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T00:58:08Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:238512024-07-12T07:00:46Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23851/ Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines" J. Valdez, Renalyn A. Palagtiw, Diondy T. Sacueza, Donnie The spread of misinformation is a growing concern in today's digital age. The Vlog by Russel Brand titled "The Truth about Pfizer's Vaccines" features various claims about the safety and efficacy of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. The study sought to answer the question, “How does the Vlog “The Truth about Pfizer’s Vaccines” constructed for public understanding and engagement?” The study used Kenneth Burke’s Dramatism Theory to examine the arguments in Russel Brand’s Vlog. It analyzed both stated and implied messages and made an in-depth look at the underlying reasons and purpose of such messages and meaning-making. In this study, Brand’s Vlog on Pfizer’s vaccines was examined using Burke’s Pentad. The study used a qualitative design with Textual Analysis as a tool. Concepts of construction, understanding, and engagement were examined using Dramatic Pentad while understanding and engagement were analyzed using Identification and Guilt. The Vlog “The Truth about Pfizer’s Vaccines” was constructed for public awareness and engagement, not so much for understanding. The Vlog emphasized the possible conspiracy between academic scientists and pharmaceutical giants. It, however, failed to provide an understanding as to how the system operates given the health crisis, professional and ethical standards of industries and communities involved, and policies, programs, and regulations both in the private and public sectors. Overall, Brand’s Vlog appealed to the public with this formula: Keep the discussion simple, center on the message by repetition, and target the public’s emotions. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23851/13/komunikasi_27.pdf J. Valdez, Renalyn and A. Palagtiw, Diondy and T. Sacueza, Donnie (2024) Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines". Jurnal Komunikasi ; Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40 (1). pp. 483-495. ISSN 0128-1496 https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/issue/view/1644
spellingShingle J. Valdez, Renalyn
A. Palagtiw, Diondy
T. Sacueza, Donnie
Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines"
title Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines"
title_full Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines"
title_fullStr Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines"
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines"
title_short Analysis of Russel brand’s vlog on “The Truth About Pfizer’s Vaccines"
title_sort analysis of russel brand’s vlog on “the truth about pfizer’s vaccines"
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23851/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23851/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23851/13/komunikasi_27.pdf