Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism

Anthropomorphism stands at the heart of many theological discourses and is among the most discussed issues by Muslim scholars. Anthropomorphic descriptions of God are mentioned in several Quranic verses and hadith for instance, God’s hand, God’s laughter, God’s heavenly throne, God’s hand and finger...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nurhanisah Senin, Khadijah Mohd Khambali @ Hambali, Wan Adli Wan Ramli, Mustafa Kamal Amat Misra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2022
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20994/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20994/1/56877-187854-1-SM.pdf
_version_ 1848815244004032512
author Nurhanisah Senin,
Khadijah Mohd Khambali @ Hambali,
Wan Adli Wan Ramli,
Mustafa Kamal Amat Misra,
author_facet Nurhanisah Senin,
Khadijah Mohd Khambali @ Hambali,
Wan Adli Wan Ramli,
Mustafa Kamal Amat Misra,
author_sort Nurhanisah Senin,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Anthropomorphism stands at the heart of many theological discourses and is among the most discussed issues by Muslim scholars. Anthropomorphic descriptions of God are mentioned in several Quranic verses and hadith for instance, God’s hand, God’s laughter, God’s heavenly throne, God’s hand and fingers and others. More often than not, anthropomorphic verses were interpreted in a different manner according to a scholar’s theological affinity. Thus, this paper aims to examine al-Ghazālī’s method in dealing with anthropomorphic verses. Imam al-Ghazālī was among the Asha‘irah scholars who wrote extensively on theological and philosophical issues. By adopting document analysis method, this study explores al-Ghazālī’s methods by analyzing his writings mainly in Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn and Fayṣal al-Tafriqah baina al-Islām wa al-Zindiqah, Iljām al-Awām ‘an Ilm al-Kalām apart from his other treatises such as al-Iqtiṣād fī al-‘Itiqād and Qānūn al-Ta’wīl. It can be found that al-Ghazālī strongly affirms God’s incorporeality by renouncing God’s essence from any bodily figures, space, accidents and directions. Apart from that, al-Ghazālī offered two different approaches in understanding anthropomorphic verses for the learned and laymen. For the learned, al-Ghazālī allowed strict allegorical interpretation with its rules. As for laymen, al-Ghazālī suggested seven steps in understanding antrhopomophic verses in ensuring the sanctity of God’s Essence from any figurative literal interpretation. In sum, this study demonstrates al-Ghazālī’s holistic approach in refuting anthropomorphism that includes the learned and laymen and ensuring one’s creed is preserved from any figurative understanding of God.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T00:46:53Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:20994
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T00:46:53Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:209942023-01-26T07:03:20Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20994/ Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism Nurhanisah Senin, Khadijah Mohd Khambali @ Hambali, Wan Adli Wan Ramli, Mustafa Kamal Amat Misra, Anthropomorphism stands at the heart of many theological discourses and is among the most discussed issues by Muslim scholars. Anthropomorphic descriptions of God are mentioned in several Quranic verses and hadith for instance, God’s hand, God’s laughter, God’s heavenly throne, God’s hand and fingers and others. More often than not, anthropomorphic verses were interpreted in a different manner according to a scholar’s theological affinity. Thus, this paper aims to examine al-Ghazālī’s method in dealing with anthropomorphic verses. Imam al-Ghazālī was among the Asha‘irah scholars who wrote extensively on theological and philosophical issues. By adopting document analysis method, this study explores al-Ghazālī’s methods by analyzing his writings mainly in Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn and Fayṣal al-Tafriqah baina al-Islām wa al-Zindiqah, Iljām al-Awām ‘an Ilm al-Kalām apart from his other treatises such as al-Iqtiṣād fī al-‘Itiqād and Qānūn al-Ta’wīl. It can be found that al-Ghazālī strongly affirms God’s incorporeality by renouncing God’s essence from any bodily figures, space, accidents and directions. Apart from that, al-Ghazālī offered two different approaches in understanding anthropomorphic verses for the learned and laymen. For the learned, al-Ghazālī allowed strict allegorical interpretation with its rules. As for laymen, al-Ghazālī suggested seven steps in understanding antrhopomophic verses in ensuring the sanctity of God’s Essence from any figurative literal interpretation. In sum, this study demonstrates al-Ghazālī’s holistic approach in refuting anthropomorphism that includes the learned and laymen and ensuring one’s creed is preserved from any figurative understanding of God. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20994/1/56877-187854-1-SM.pdf Nurhanisah Senin, and Khadijah Mohd Khambali @ Hambali, and Wan Adli Wan Ramli, and Mustafa Kamal Amat Misra, (2022) Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism. Islamiyyat : Jurnal Antarabangsa Pengajian Islam; International Journal of Islamic Studies, 44 . pp. 9-15. ISSN 0216-5636 https://ejournal.ukm.my/islamiyyat/issue/view/1532
spellingShingle Nurhanisah Senin,
Khadijah Mohd Khambali @ Hambali,
Wan Adli Wan Ramli,
Mustafa Kamal Amat Misra,
Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism
title Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism
title_full Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism
title_fullStr Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism
title_full_unstemmed Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism
title_short Al-Ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism
title_sort al-ghazālī’s approach in refuting anthropomorphism
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20994/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20994/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/20994/1/56877-187854-1-SM.pdf