Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions

This study examines the association between controlling shareholders’ networks (i.e., controlling shareholders’ proxy (CSProxy) and controlling shareholders’ multiple-directorships (CSMultiD)) and related-party transactions (RPTs), particularly involving controlling shareholders’ interests (RPT-conf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Mohid Rahmat, Hanis Amera Mohd Amin, Norman Mohd Saleh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2018
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19705/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19705/1/25265-90564-1-PB.pdf
_version_ 1848814909884727296
author Mohd Mohid Rahmat,
Hanis Amera Mohd Amin,
Norman Mohd Saleh,
author_facet Mohd Mohid Rahmat,
Hanis Amera Mohd Amin,
Norman Mohd Saleh,
author_sort Mohd Mohid Rahmat,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study examines the association between controlling shareholders’ networks (i.e., controlling shareholders’ proxy (CSProxy) and controlling shareholders’ multiple-directorships (CSMultiD)) and related-party transactions (RPTs), particularly involving controlling shareholders’ interests (RPT-conflict). This study also examines the impact of interaction between CSProxy and CSMultiD on firm engagement with RPTs, and RPT-conflict. The hypotheses are tested using a sample of 548 listed companies in Malaysia over the period 2012-2014 with a total of 1,550 observations. The results show that CSProxy is not associated with RPTs, and RPT-conflict. The CSMultiD is also not associated with RPTs. However, it has a positive relationship with RPT-conflict. Additionally, an interaction between CSProxy and CSMultiD increases the likelihood of firms to engage and disclose more RPTs; in contrast, it discloses lower magnitude of RPT-conflict. The opportunistic controlling shareholders may exploit their conflict of interest for private benefits by hiding their intention behind the RPTs. Overall, these findings provide partial empirical support to the argument that controlling shareholders seek to use their network relationship to influence firms to engage with related parties. These findings raise concerns to the regulators and policy makers, specifically on the ability of the controlling shareholders in utilizing their position and networks opportunistically to expropriate firm resources for personal purposes.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T00:41:35Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:19705
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T00:41:35Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:197052022-09-15T01:16:26Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19705/ Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions Mohd Mohid Rahmat, Hanis Amera Mohd Amin, Norman Mohd Saleh, This study examines the association between controlling shareholders’ networks (i.e., controlling shareholders’ proxy (CSProxy) and controlling shareholders’ multiple-directorships (CSMultiD)) and related-party transactions (RPTs), particularly involving controlling shareholders’ interests (RPT-conflict). This study also examines the impact of interaction between CSProxy and CSMultiD on firm engagement with RPTs, and RPT-conflict. The hypotheses are tested using a sample of 548 listed companies in Malaysia over the period 2012-2014 with a total of 1,550 observations. The results show that CSProxy is not associated with RPTs, and RPT-conflict. The CSMultiD is also not associated with RPTs. However, it has a positive relationship with RPT-conflict. Additionally, an interaction between CSProxy and CSMultiD increases the likelihood of firms to engage and disclose more RPTs; in contrast, it discloses lower magnitude of RPT-conflict. The opportunistic controlling shareholders may exploit their conflict of interest for private benefits by hiding their intention behind the RPTs. Overall, these findings provide partial empirical support to the argument that controlling shareholders seek to use their network relationship to influence firms to engage with related parties. These findings raise concerns to the regulators and policy makers, specifically on the ability of the controlling shareholders in utilizing their position and networks opportunistically to expropriate firm resources for personal purposes. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2018 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19705/1/25265-90564-1-PB.pdf Mohd Mohid Rahmat, and Hanis Amera Mohd Amin, and Norman Mohd Saleh, (2018) Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 9 . pp. 27-39. ISSN 2180-3838 https://ejournal.ukm.my/ajac/issue/view/1084/showToc
spellingShingle Mohd Mohid Rahmat,
Hanis Amera Mohd Amin,
Norman Mohd Saleh,
Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions
title Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions
title_full Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions
title_fullStr Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions
title_full_unstemmed Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions
title_short Controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions
title_sort controlling shareholders’ proxy and multiple directorships : insight evidence from related party transactions
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19705/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19705/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19705/1/25265-90564-1-PB.pdf