Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign

This article discusses hate speech on Facebook from two groups of supporters for the presidential candidates in the 2019 Presidential Election in Indonesia. The study used a virtual ethnography approach to analyze cultural groups or communities through their conversations on the Facebook platform. D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bajari, Atwar, Koswara, Iwan, Erlandia, Dedi Rumawan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18712/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18712/1/39517-174347-1-PB.pdf
_version_ 1848814646254895104
author Bajari, Atwar
Koswara, Iwan
Erlandia, Dedi Rumawan
author_facet Bajari, Atwar
Koswara, Iwan
Erlandia, Dedi Rumawan
author_sort Bajari, Atwar
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This article discusses hate speech on Facebook from two groups of supporters for the presidential candidates in the 2019 Presidential Election in Indonesia. The study used a virtual ethnography approach to analyze cultural groups or communities through their conversations on the Facebook platform. Data collection was conducted by observing and collecting words, phrases, and sentences in the Official Facebook account of two presidential candidates in the 2019 Presidential Election and statements of both presidential and vice-presidential candidates in 2019. In addition, researchers also observed three voluntary group accounts for each candidate. Therefore, the total number of accounts observed was eight. Data was analysed with Nvivo 12+ to obtain statistics on the strength of the chosen speech word and the dominant phrase or word that appears. The result shows that specific phrases or terms to intimidate each supporter of both parties in massive numbers appeared in the form of hate speech during the campaign. The purpose of the hate speech is to insult/humiliate, intimidate or accuse others of doing something inappropriate or evil (accusation which involves sarcasm and foul language directed to the opponent. Candidates also provoked each other by accusing the other party of being stupid, disgusting, pathetic, ugly, and retarded. The implication was that hate speech has disunited the public on the social media space. Accusing and attaching bad characters to other groups through hate speech has strengthened inter-group stereotypes and formed an unhealthy democratic climate.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T00:37:23Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:18712
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T00:37:23Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:187122022-05-31T08:44:06Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18712/ Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign Bajari, Atwar Koswara, Iwan Erlandia, Dedi Rumawan This article discusses hate speech on Facebook from two groups of supporters for the presidential candidates in the 2019 Presidential Election in Indonesia. The study used a virtual ethnography approach to analyze cultural groups or communities through their conversations on the Facebook platform. Data collection was conducted by observing and collecting words, phrases, and sentences in the Official Facebook account of two presidential candidates in the 2019 Presidential Election and statements of both presidential and vice-presidential candidates in 2019. In addition, researchers also observed three voluntary group accounts for each candidate. Therefore, the total number of accounts observed was eight. Data was analysed with Nvivo 12+ to obtain statistics on the strength of the chosen speech word and the dominant phrase or word that appears. The result shows that specific phrases or terms to intimidate each supporter of both parties in massive numbers appeared in the form of hate speech during the campaign. The purpose of the hate speech is to insult/humiliate, intimidate or accuse others of doing something inappropriate or evil (accusation which involves sarcasm and foul language directed to the opponent. Candidates also provoked each other by accusing the other party of being stupid, disgusting, pathetic, ugly, and retarded. The implication was that hate speech has disunited the public on the social media space. Accusing and attaching bad characters to other groups through hate speech has strengthened inter-group stereotypes and formed an unhealthy democratic climate. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18712/1/39517-174347-1-PB.pdf Bajari, Atwar and Koswara, Iwan and Erlandia, Dedi Rumawan (2021) Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign. Jurnal Komunikasi ; Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37 (4). pp. 122-141. ISSN 0128-1496 https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/issue/view/1451
spellingShingle Bajari, Atwar
Koswara, Iwan
Erlandia, Dedi Rumawan
Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign
title Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign
title_full Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign
title_fullStr Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign
title_full_unstemmed Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign
title_short Hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on Facebook in 2019 Indonesian presidential campaign
title_sort hatenography : an analysis of hate speech on facebook in 2019 indonesian presidential campaign
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18712/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18712/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18712/1/39517-174347-1-PB.pdf