Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers

Conventional classroom discourse structure that nurtures literacy through the scientific way of thinking is argued to limit personal engagement and exploration of alternative thinking processes among literary thinkers. In nurturing literacy for the literate mind, this study investigated how the li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tina Abdullah, Zaidah Zainal, Abdul Halim Abdul Raof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18039/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18039/1/46536-167820-1-PB.pdf
_version_ 1848814467722248192
author Tina Abdullah,
Zaidah Zainal,
Abdul Halim Abdul Raof,
author_facet Tina Abdullah,
Zaidah Zainal,
Abdul Halim Abdul Raof,
author_sort Tina Abdullah,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Conventional classroom discourse structure that nurtures literacy through the scientific way of thinking is argued to limit personal engagement and exploration of alternative thinking processes among literary thinkers. In nurturing literacy for the literate mind, this study investigated how the literary way of thinking through group interaction can become a powerful alternative avenue to complement the established scientific way of thinking. Based on the Reader Response and Envisionment Building theories, participants were given the freedom to wander and become personally involved in group interactions advancing thinking about meaning through exploring horizons of possibilities. Through peer-led group discussions, this case study examined a group of 31 undergraduate learners who discussed a short story as part of a literature course. The overall findings show that when given the freedom to explore horizons of possibilities through group interactions, the participants demonstrated personal engagement and the ability to explore different thinking processes. Among the common themes observed were that participants shared personal recalling of facts or literary devices, contemplated personal interpretations of meaning, discussed the personal evaluation of the text, expressed doubts or misunderstandings, made personal connections or extended the imaginary world. It may thus be concluded that to nurture the literate mind, the literary way of thinking should complement the scientific way of thinking to promote different thinking processes and personal engagement. Opportunities to explore horizons of possibilities through group interactions support literacy in literature classrooms.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T00:34:33Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:18039
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T00:34:33Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:180392022-02-13T00:28:18Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18039/ Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers Tina Abdullah, Zaidah Zainal, Abdul Halim Abdul Raof, Conventional classroom discourse structure that nurtures literacy through the scientific way of thinking is argued to limit personal engagement and exploration of alternative thinking processes among literary thinkers. In nurturing literacy for the literate mind, this study investigated how the literary way of thinking through group interaction can become a powerful alternative avenue to complement the established scientific way of thinking. Based on the Reader Response and Envisionment Building theories, participants were given the freedom to wander and become personally involved in group interactions advancing thinking about meaning through exploring horizons of possibilities. Through peer-led group discussions, this case study examined a group of 31 undergraduate learners who discussed a short story as part of a literature course. The overall findings show that when given the freedom to explore horizons of possibilities through group interactions, the participants demonstrated personal engagement and the ability to explore different thinking processes. Among the common themes observed were that participants shared personal recalling of facts or literary devices, contemplated personal interpretations of meaning, discussed the personal evaluation of the text, expressed doubts or misunderstandings, made personal connections or extended the imaginary world. It may thus be concluded that to nurture the literate mind, the literary way of thinking should complement the scientific way of thinking to promote different thinking processes and personal engagement. Opportunities to explore horizons of possibilities through group interactions support literacy in literature classrooms. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021-09 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18039/1/46536-167820-1-PB.pdf Tina Abdullah, and Zaidah Zainal, and Abdul Halim Abdul Raof, (2021) Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers. 3L; Language,Linguistics and Literature,The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 27 (3). pp. 114-128. ISSN 0128-5157 https://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/view/1423
spellingShingle Tina Abdullah,
Zaidah Zainal,
Abdul Halim Abdul Raof,
Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers
title Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers
title_full Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers
title_fullStr Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers
title_full_unstemmed Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers
title_short Nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers
title_sort nurturing the literate mind through group interaction among literary thinkers
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18039/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18039/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/18039/1/46536-167820-1-PB.pdf