Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra
Hume divides all propositions into two parts: the relations of ideas and matters of fact. He considers the first part certain and matters of fact that makes us aware of the future and can take us beyond sensory perception are uncertain. He believes all reasoning about matters of fact is based...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2020
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16353/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16353/1/IJIT-Vol-18-Dec-2020_7_65-72.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848814031006072832 |
|---|---|
| author | Marvinam, Mohsen |
| author_facet | Marvinam, Mohsen |
| author_sort | Marvinam, Mohsen |
| building | UKM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Hume divides all propositions into two parts: the relations of ideas and matters of
fact. He considers the first part certain and matters of fact that makes us aware of
the future and can take us beyond sensory perception are uncertain. He believes all
reasoning about matters of fact is based on the relation of cause and effect and the
principle of uniformity of nature. Based on his especial epistemology, argues that the
principle of causality is a mental habit and the principle of uniformity of nature is
matter of facts must be proved by experience that its proof and argument is probable
that leads to a circle and ultimately expresses his skepticism. Commentators of
transcendent wisdom based on the intuitive knowledge of the soul in its own works
and actions, proved the idea of causality. They have discussed the unity of sensory
and sensible theory, along with the principle of self-evident of causality that these
theories only explain the origin of the concept of causality and its generality.
However, the main question is how can causality be attributed to objective
instances? In response, we have discussed the combination and sum of reason and
sense using the experimental method. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T00:27:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:16353 |
| institution | Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T00:27:37Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:163532021-03-29T07:32:19Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16353/ Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra Marvinam, Mohsen Hume divides all propositions into two parts: the relations of ideas and matters of fact. He considers the first part certain and matters of fact that makes us aware of the future and can take us beyond sensory perception are uncertain. He believes all reasoning about matters of fact is based on the relation of cause and effect and the principle of uniformity of nature. Based on his especial epistemology, argues that the principle of causality is a mental habit and the principle of uniformity of nature is matter of facts must be proved by experience that its proof and argument is probable that leads to a circle and ultimately expresses his skepticism. Commentators of transcendent wisdom based on the intuitive knowledge of the soul in its own works and actions, proved the idea of causality. They have discussed the unity of sensory and sensible theory, along with the principle of self-evident of causality that these theories only explain the origin of the concept of causality and its generality. However, the main question is how can causality be attributed to objective instances? In response, we have discussed the combination and sum of reason and sense using the experimental method. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2020-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16353/1/IJIT-Vol-18-Dec-2020_7_65-72.pdf Marvinam, Mohsen (2020) Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra. International Journal of Islamic Thought ( IJIT ), 18 . pp. 65-72. ISSN 2232-1314 http://www.ukm.my/ijit/volume-18-dec-2020/ |
| spellingShingle | Marvinam, Mohsen Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra |
| title | Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra |
| title_full | Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra |
| title_fullStr | Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra |
| title_full_unstemmed | Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra |
| title_short | Denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of Mulla Sadra |
| title_sort | denial of causality by hume and answer of commentators of transcendent wisdom of mulla sadra |
| url | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16353/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16353/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16353/1/IJIT-Vol-18-Dec-2020_7_65-72.pdf |