A comparative analysis of the theological polemics of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah
The experience of the Muslim Ummah in the 19th and 20th centuries has given rise to various revivalist thoughts aimed at reclaiming the lost glory of Islam and returning Muslims to their right position. The Muslim Brotherhood current Salafiyyah groups represent the largest revivalist trend in cur...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2019
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14021/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14021/1/IJIT-Vol-15-June-2019_2_17-26.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848813438958043136 |
|---|---|
| author | Arikewuyo, Ahmed Nafiu |
| author_facet | Arikewuyo, Ahmed Nafiu |
| author_sort | Arikewuyo, Ahmed Nafiu |
| building | UKM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The experience of the Muslim Ummah in the 19th and 20th centuries has given rise to
various revivalist thoughts aimed at reclaiming the lost glory of Islam and returning
Muslims to their right position. The Muslim Brotherhood current Salafiyyah groups
represent the largest revivalist trend in current time. Despite having the common
mission of revitalizing the Ummah, the two trends are always at loggerhead over
pressing issues of Islam. Hence, the research focuses on theological polemics as case
study for the multitudinous contention between the two trends. Library research
methodology was adopted. Findings of the research show that both trends share
common fundamental creeds and that the popular theological dichotomy between them
is due to various factors namely: the degree of priority attached to creeds, attitude
towards equivocal matters of creed such as anthropomorphic status of Allah and lastly
theologizing matters which are juristic. The research recommends the needs for the
Salafiyyah group to focus on theological training rather than the traditionally
theological polemics which was a product of refutation against the evolving heretic
sects that are ideologically not existing today. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T00:18:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:14021 |
| institution | Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T00:18:12Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:140212020-01-24T08:57:57Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14021/ A comparative analysis of the theological polemics of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah Arikewuyo, Ahmed Nafiu The experience of the Muslim Ummah in the 19th and 20th centuries has given rise to various revivalist thoughts aimed at reclaiming the lost glory of Islam and returning Muslims to their right position. The Muslim Brotherhood current Salafiyyah groups represent the largest revivalist trend in current time. Despite having the common mission of revitalizing the Ummah, the two trends are always at loggerhead over pressing issues of Islam. Hence, the research focuses on theological polemics as case study for the multitudinous contention between the two trends. Library research methodology was adopted. Findings of the research show that both trends share common fundamental creeds and that the popular theological dichotomy between them is due to various factors namely: the degree of priority attached to creeds, attitude towards equivocal matters of creed such as anthropomorphic status of Allah and lastly theologizing matters which are juristic. The research recommends the needs for the Salafiyyah group to focus on theological training rather than the traditionally theological polemics which was a product of refutation against the evolving heretic sects that are ideologically not existing today. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14021/1/IJIT-Vol-15-June-2019_2_17-26.pdf Arikewuyo, Ahmed Nafiu (2019) A comparative analysis of the theological polemics of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah. International Journal of Islamic Thought ( IJIT ), 15 . pp. 17-26. ISSN 2232-1314 http://www.ukm.my/ijit/volume-15-june-2019/ |
| spellingShingle | Arikewuyo, Ahmed Nafiu A comparative analysis of the theological polemics of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah |
| title | A comparative analysis of the theological polemics
of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah |
| title_full | A comparative analysis of the theological polemics
of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah |
| title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of the theological polemics
of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of the theological polemics
of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah |
| title_short | A comparative analysis of the theological polemics
of Muslim Brotherhood and Salafiyyah |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of the theological polemics
of muslim brotherhood and salafiyyah |
| url | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14021/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14021/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14021/1/IJIT-Vol-15-June-2019_2_17-26.pdf |