Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case

The purpose of this paper is to raise certain questions within the Malaysian banking sector and find the appropriate answers. The research questions of this paper are: a) whether Islamic banks are more stable relative to conventional banks; and b) what are the determinants of stability for both ty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhamad Azhari Wahid, Humayon Dar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2016
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10773/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10773/1/jeko_50%281%29-9.pdf
_version_ 1848812503943872512
author Muhamad Azhari Wahid,
Humayon Dar,
author_facet Muhamad Azhari Wahid,
Humayon Dar,
author_sort Muhamad Azhari Wahid,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The purpose of this paper is to raise certain questions within the Malaysian banking sector and find the appropriate answers. The research questions of this paper are: a) whether Islamic banks are more stable relative to conventional banks; and b) what are the determinants of stability for both types of banks? In measuring and comparing the stability of Islamic and conventional banks, this study employs the financial soundness indicators (FSI) of the International Monetary Funds (IMF) and the z-score index. These are then followed by a series of parametric and non-parametric tests. Thereafter, a pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) robust regression is applied to examine the determinants of stability for Islamic and conventional banks. The results reveal that Islamic banks are significantly less stable than conventional banks. However, when the analysis is conducted based on a sample of small and large banks, the results suggest that only large Islamic banks are less stable than large conventional banks. In contrast, small Islamic banks are found to be more stable than small conventional banks. Furthermore, the results reveal that bank size, the level of capitalisation and income diversification are important determinants for the stability of Malaysian Islamic and conventional banks.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T00:03:20Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:10773
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T00:03:20Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:107732017-10-10T08:27:15Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10773/ Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case Muhamad Azhari Wahid, Humayon Dar, The purpose of this paper is to raise certain questions within the Malaysian banking sector and find the appropriate answers. The research questions of this paper are: a) whether Islamic banks are more stable relative to conventional banks; and b) what are the determinants of stability for both types of banks? In measuring and comparing the stability of Islamic and conventional banks, this study employs the financial soundness indicators (FSI) of the International Monetary Funds (IMF) and the z-score index. These are then followed by a series of parametric and non-parametric tests. Thereafter, a pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) robust regression is applied to examine the determinants of stability for Islamic and conventional banks. The results reveal that Islamic banks are significantly less stable than conventional banks. However, when the analysis is conducted based on a sample of small and large banks, the results suggest that only large Islamic banks are less stable than large conventional banks. In contrast, small Islamic banks are found to be more stable than small conventional banks. Furthermore, the results reveal that bank size, the level of capitalisation and income diversification are important determinants for the stability of Malaysian Islamic and conventional banks. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2016 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10773/1/jeko_50%281%29-9.pdf Muhamad Azhari Wahid, and Humayon Dar, (2016) Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 50 (1). pp. 111-131. ISSN 0127-1962 http://www.ukm.my/fep/jem/content/2016.html
spellingShingle Muhamad Azhari Wahid,
Humayon Dar,
Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case
title Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case
title_full Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case
title_fullStr Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case
title_full_unstemmed Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case
title_short Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: a Malaysian case
title_sort stability of islamic versus conventional banks: a malaysian case
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10773/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10773/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10773/1/jeko_50%281%29-9.pdf