Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke

Background Recurrent stroke is a frequent, disabling event after ischemic stroke. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two antiplatelet regimens — aspirin plus extendedrelease dipyridamole (ASA–ERDP) versus clopidogrel. Methods In this double-blind, 2-by-2 factorial trial, we randomly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sacco, Ralph L., Diener, Hans-Christoph, Yusuf, Salim, Cotton, Daniel, Ounpuu, Stephanie, Lawton, William A., Palesch, Yuko, Martin, Renée H., Albers, Gregory W., Bath, Philip M.W., Bornstein, Natan, Chan, Bernard P.L., Chen, Sien-Tsong, Cunha, Luis, Dahlöf, Björn, De Keyser, Jacques, Donnan, Geoffrey A., Estol, Conrado, Gorelick, Philip, Gu, Vivian, Hermansson, Karin, Hillbrich, Lutz, Kaste, Markku, Lu, Chuanzhen, Machnig, Thomas, Pais, Prem, Roberts, Robin, Skvortsova, Veronika, Teal, Philip, Toni, Danilo, Vandermaelen, Cam, Voight, Thor, Weber, Michael, Yoon, Byung-Woo
Format: Article
Published: Massacheutts Medical Society 2008
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/953/
_version_ 1848790510452342784
author Sacco, Ralph L.
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Yusuf, Salim
Cotton, Daniel
Ounpuu, Stephanie
Lawton, William A.
Palesch, Yuko
Martin, Renée H.
Albers, Gregory W.
Bath, Philip M.W.
Bornstein, Natan
Chan, Bernard P.L.
Chen, Sien-Tsong
Cunha, Luis
Dahlöf, Björn
De Keyser, Jacques
Donnan, Geoffrey A.
Estol, Conrado
Gorelick, Philip
Gu, Vivian
Hermansson, Karin
Hillbrich, Lutz
Kaste, Markku
Lu, Chuanzhen
Machnig, Thomas
Pais, Prem
Roberts, Robin
Skvortsova, Veronika
Teal, Philip
Toni, Danilo
Vandermaelen, Cam
Voight, Thor
Weber, Michael
Yoon, Byung-Woo
author_facet Sacco, Ralph L.
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Yusuf, Salim
Cotton, Daniel
Ounpuu, Stephanie
Lawton, William A.
Palesch, Yuko
Martin, Renée H.
Albers, Gregory W.
Bath, Philip M.W.
Bornstein, Natan
Chan, Bernard P.L.
Chen, Sien-Tsong
Cunha, Luis
Dahlöf, Björn
De Keyser, Jacques
Donnan, Geoffrey A.
Estol, Conrado
Gorelick, Philip
Gu, Vivian
Hermansson, Karin
Hillbrich, Lutz
Kaste, Markku
Lu, Chuanzhen
Machnig, Thomas
Pais, Prem
Roberts, Robin
Skvortsova, Veronika
Teal, Philip
Toni, Danilo
Vandermaelen, Cam
Voight, Thor
Weber, Michael
Yoon, Byung-Woo
author_sort Sacco, Ralph L.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background Recurrent stroke is a frequent, disabling event after ischemic stroke. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two antiplatelet regimens — aspirin plus extendedrelease dipyridamole (ASA–ERDP) versus clopidogrel. Methods In this double-blind, 2-by-2 factorial trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive 25 mg of aspirin plus 200 mg of extended-release dipyridamole twice daily or to receive 75 mg of clopidogrel daily. The primary outcome was first recurrence of stroke. The secondary outcome was a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular causes. Sequential statistical testing of noninferiority (margin of 1.075), followed by superiority testing, was planned. Results A total of 20,332 patients were followed for a mean of 2.5 years. Recurrent stroke occurred in 916 patients (9.0%) receiving ASA–ERDP and in 898 patients (8.8%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.11). The secondary outcome occurred in 1333 patients (13.1%) in each group (hazard ratio for ASA–ERDP, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.07). There were more major hemorrhagic events among ASA–ERDP recipients (419 [4.1%]) than among clopidogrel recipients (365 [3.6%]) (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.32), including intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.83). The net risk of recurrent stroke or major hemorrhagic event was similar in the two groups (1194 ASA–ERDP recipients [11.7%], vs. 1156 clopidogrel recipients [11.4%]; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.11). Conclusions The trial did not meet the predefined criteria for noninferiority but showed similar rates of recurrent stroke with ASA–ERDP and with clopidogrel. There is no evidence that either of the two treatments was superior to the other in the prevention of recurrent stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153062.)
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:13:46Z
format Article
id nottingham-953
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:13:46Z
publishDate 2008
publisher Massacheutts Medical Society
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-9532020-05-04T20:27:53Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/953/ Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke Sacco, Ralph L. Diener, Hans-Christoph Yusuf, Salim Cotton, Daniel Ounpuu, Stephanie Lawton, William A. Palesch, Yuko Martin, Renée H. Albers, Gregory W. Bath, Philip M.W. Bornstein, Natan Chan, Bernard P.L. Chen, Sien-Tsong Cunha, Luis Dahlöf, Björn De Keyser, Jacques Donnan, Geoffrey A. Estol, Conrado Gorelick, Philip Gu, Vivian Hermansson, Karin Hillbrich, Lutz Kaste, Markku Lu, Chuanzhen Machnig, Thomas Pais, Prem Roberts, Robin Skvortsova, Veronika Teal, Philip Toni, Danilo Vandermaelen, Cam Voight, Thor Weber, Michael Yoon, Byung-Woo Background Recurrent stroke is a frequent, disabling event after ischemic stroke. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two antiplatelet regimens — aspirin plus extendedrelease dipyridamole (ASA–ERDP) versus clopidogrel. Methods In this double-blind, 2-by-2 factorial trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive 25 mg of aspirin plus 200 mg of extended-release dipyridamole twice daily or to receive 75 mg of clopidogrel daily. The primary outcome was first recurrence of stroke. The secondary outcome was a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from vascular causes. Sequential statistical testing of noninferiority (margin of 1.075), followed by superiority testing, was planned. Results A total of 20,332 patients were followed for a mean of 2.5 years. Recurrent stroke occurred in 916 patients (9.0%) receiving ASA–ERDP and in 898 patients (8.8%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.11). The secondary outcome occurred in 1333 patients (13.1%) in each group (hazard ratio for ASA–ERDP, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.07). There were more major hemorrhagic events among ASA–ERDP recipients (419 [4.1%]) than among clopidogrel recipients (365 [3.6%]) (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.32), including intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.83). The net risk of recurrent stroke or major hemorrhagic event was similar in the two groups (1194 ASA–ERDP recipients [11.7%], vs. 1156 clopidogrel recipients [11.4%]; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.11). Conclusions The trial did not meet the predefined criteria for noninferiority but showed similar rates of recurrent stroke with ASA–ERDP and with clopidogrel. There is no evidence that either of the two treatments was superior to the other in the prevention of recurrent stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153062.) Massacheutts Medical Society 2008 Article PeerReviewed Sacco, Ralph L., Diener, Hans-Christoph, Yusuf, Salim, Cotton, Daniel, Ounpuu, Stephanie, Lawton, William A., Palesch, Yuko, Martin, Renée H., Albers, Gregory W., Bath, Philip M.W., Bornstein, Natan, Chan, Bernard P.L., Chen, Sien-Tsong, Cunha, Luis, Dahlöf, Björn, De Keyser, Jacques, Donnan, Geoffrey A., Estol, Conrado, Gorelick, Philip, Gu, Vivian, Hermansson, Karin, Hillbrich, Lutz, Kaste, Markku, Lu, Chuanzhen, Machnig, Thomas, Pais, Prem, Roberts, Robin, Skvortsova, Veronika, Teal, Philip, Toni, Danilo, Vandermaelen, Cam, Voight, Thor, Weber, Michael and Yoon, Byung-Woo (2008) Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 359 (12). pp. 1238-1251. ISSN 0028-4793 http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/12/1238 10.1056/NEJMoa0805002 10.1056/NEJMoa0805002 10.1056/NEJMoa0805002
spellingShingle Sacco, Ralph L.
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Yusuf, Salim
Cotton, Daniel
Ounpuu, Stephanie
Lawton, William A.
Palesch, Yuko
Martin, Renée H.
Albers, Gregory W.
Bath, Philip M.W.
Bornstein, Natan
Chan, Bernard P.L.
Chen, Sien-Tsong
Cunha, Luis
Dahlöf, Björn
De Keyser, Jacques
Donnan, Geoffrey A.
Estol, Conrado
Gorelick, Philip
Gu, Vivian
Hermansson, Karin
Hillbrich, Lutz
Kaste, Markku
Lu, Chuanzhen
Machnig, Thomas
Pais, Prem
Roberts, Robin
Skvortsova, Veronika
Teal, Philip
Toni, Danilo
Vandermaelen, Cam
Voight, Thor
Weber, Michael
Yoon, Byung-Woo
Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
title Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
title_full Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
title_fullStr Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
title_full_unstemmed Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
title_short Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
title_sort aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/953/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/953/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/953/