A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data
Landslides pose significant threats to human life, infrastructure, and the environment. Rapid accurate assessment and identification of these landslides within days to weeks of their occurrence are crucial for timely disaster management and effective emergency response strategies. This study evaluat...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis (University of Nottingham only) |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/80395/ |
| _version_ | 1848801242682228736 |
|---|---|
| author | Akanazu, Lilian Akudo |
| author_facet | Akanazu, Lilian Akudo |
| author_sort | Akanazu, Lilian Akudo |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Landslides pose significant threats to human life, infrastructure, and the environment. Rapid accurate assessment and identification of these landslides within days to weeks of their occurrence are crucial for timely disaster management and effective emergency response strategies. This study evaluated the performance of freely accessible EO-based tools - HazMapper and Google Earth Engine (GEE), alongside manual delineation technique in the detection and rapid mapping of landslides in Glengyle. Recent landslides which typically leave visible scars on the landscape were primarily considered using two approaches applied by these EO-based tools: pixel-based analysis and SLIP algorithm for change detection. The integration of these methods provides a comprehensive assessment of landslide areas as they consider both changes in vegetation cover and topography. By comparing the pre- and post-event composites of the study area, the landslides were detected based on the NDVI and landslide tracker binary raster image generated by HazMapper and GEE, while the manual technique employed the physical delineation of the landslides using satellite imagery. The performance metrics of these methods identified GEE as the best-performing method with an F1 score of 0.83 over HazMapper and manual technique’s 0.81 and 0.79 F1 scores respectively. The kappa value of 0.62 for GEE suggests that the tool’s efficacy in rapid landslide mapping performed substantially better than random chance. Replication of the GEE in the secondary (Rest and Be Thankful) and tertiary (Dortyol) study areas further assessed the tools efficacy in mapping other landslide types. With an F1 score of 0.82 and 0.93 for the secondary and tertiary locations, GEE correctly identified a substantial number of landslides in these locations better than random chance. The results suggest that GEE is a robust tool for rapid landslide mapping in emergency situations. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T21:04:21Z |
| format | Thesis (University of Nottingham only) |
| id | nottingham-80395 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T21:04:21Z |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-803952025-07-31T04:40:15Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/80395/ A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data Akanazu, Lilian Akudo Landslides pose significant threats to human life, infrastructure, and the environment. Rapid accurate assessment and identification of these landslides within days to weeks of their occurrence are crucial for timely disaster management and effective emergency response strategies. This study evaluated the performance of freely accessible EO-based tools - HazMapper and Google Earth Engine (GEE), alongside manual delineation technique in the detection and rapid mapping of landslides in Glengyle. Recent landslides which typically leave visible scars on the landscape were primarily considered using two approaches applied by these EO-based tools: pixel-based analysis and SLIP algorithm for change detection. The integration of these methods provides a comprehensive assessment of landslide areas as they consider both changes in vegetation cover and topography. By comparing the pre- and post-event composites of the study area, the landslides were detected based on the NDVI and landslide tracker binary raster image generated by HazMapper and GEE, while the manual technique employed the physical delineation of the landslides using satellite imagery. The performance metrics of these methods identified GEE as the best-performing method with an F1 score of 0.83 over HazMapper and manual technique’s 0.81 and 0.79 F1 scores respectively. The kappa value of 0.62 for GEE suggests that the tool’s efficacy in rapid landslide mapping performed substantially better than random chance. Replication of the GEE in the secondary (Rest and Be Thankful) and tertiary (Dortyol) study areas further assessed the tools efficacy in mapping other landslide types. With an F1 score of 0.82 and 0.93 for the secondary and tertiary locations, GEE correctly identified a substantial number of landslides in these locations better than random chance. The results suggest that GEE is a robust tool for rapid landslide mapping in emergency situations. 2025-07-31 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/80395/1/Lilian%20Akudo%20Akanazu_MRes%20Thesis.pdf Akanazu, Lilian Akudo (2025) A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data. MRes thesis, University of Nottingham. Landslides Earth Observation Google Earth Engine HazMapper Normalised Differential Vegetation Index SLIP |
| spellingShingle | Landslides Earth Observation Google Earth Engine HazMapper Normalised Differential Vegetation Index SLIP Akanazu, Lilian Akudo A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data |
| title | A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data |
| title_full | A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data |
| title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data |
| title_short | A comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (EO) data |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of landslide mapping techniques using earth observation (eo) data |
| topic | Landslides Earth Observation Google Earth Engine HazMapper Normalised Differential Vegetation Index SLIP |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/80395/ |