The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland

This is a study in political history which addresses the origins of the Union of England and Scotland in 1707. Unlike most recent scholarship, it does not take a Scottish perspective. It does not however, provide a corresponding study of ‘English’ motives and attitudes. It argues that a bilateral Sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor, Michael
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/76438/
_version_ 1848800903898857472
author Taylor, Michael
author_facet Taylor, Michael
author_sort Taylor, Michael
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This is a study in political history which addresses the origins of the Union of England and Scotland in 1707. Unlike most recent scholarship, it does not take a Scottish perspective. It does not however, provide a corresponding study of ‘English’ motives and attitudes. It argues that a bilateral Scotland-England framework is inappropriate and unhelpful for the purposes of understanding the origins of the Union. This is because such a framework fails to accord sufficient agency and autonomy to the monarchy and its closest advisers, or ‘Court group’, after the ‘Glorious Revolution’ and sufficient political coherence to the ‘Union of the Crowns’ that preceded the Union. Such ‘Court groups’ should not, therefore, be conflated with ‘England’ and their motives can be distinguished from ‘English’ motives. It concludes that rather than being the by-product of a politically expedient English parliamentary reaction to political or economic pressure from Scotland, the Union was the outcome of deliberate policy pursued by a Court group comprising Anne and her chief advisers, the Triumvirate of Godolphin, Marlborough and Harley. The origins of this policy lay in William III & II’s recognition that active participation in European great power geopolitics and war, precipitated by the Revolution, demanded greater alignment within the Union of the Crowns. This need was brought home by the profound geopolitical and domestic impact of the Scottish attempt to establish a colony in Darien. Consequently, union initiatives were launched in 1700 and 1702. Just as the geopolitical strategy of resistance to Louis XIV survived William’s death, so this union policy continued into Anne’s reign and was not abandoned after the termination of union negotiations in 1703.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:58:58Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-76438
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:58:58Z
publishDate 2023
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-764382023-12-21T10:07:38Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/76438/ The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland Taylor, Michael This is a study in political history which addresses the origins of the Union of England and Scotland in 1707. Unlike most recent scholarship, it does not take a Scottish perspective. It does not however, provide a corresponding study of ‘English’ motives and attitudes. It argues that a bilateral Scotland-England framework is inappropriate and unhelpful for the purposes of understanding the origins of the Union. This is because such a framework fails to accord sufficient agency and autonomy to the monarchy and its closest advisers, or ‘Court group’, after the ‘Glorious Revolution’ and sufficient political coherence to the ‘Union of the Crowns’ that preceded the Union. Such ‘Court groups’ should not, therefore, be conflated with ‘England’ and their motives can be distinguished from ‘English’ motives. It concludes that rather than being the by-product of a politically expedient English parliamentary reaction to political or economic pressure from Scotland, the Union was the outcome of deliberate policy pursued by a Court group comprising Anne and her chief advisers, the Triumvirate of Godolphin, Marlborough and Harley. The origins of this policy lay in William III & II’s recognition that active participation in European great power geopolitics and war, precipitated by the Revolution, demanded greater alignment within the Union of the Crowns. This need was brought home by the profound geopolitical and domestic impact of the Scottish attempt to establish a colony in Darien. Consequently, union initiatives were launched in 1700 and 1702. Just as the geopolitical strategy of resistance to Louis XIV survived William’s death, so this union policy continued into Anne’s reign and was not abandoned after the termination of union negotiations in 1703. 2023-12-15 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/76438/1/M.Taylor-4316365-The%20British%20Court%20and%20the%201707%20Union%20of%20England%20and%20Scotland-corrected%20thesis.pdf Taylor, Michael (2023) The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Act of Union 1707; union of England and Scotland; Court; Queen Anne; Sidney Godolphin; Robert Harley; John Churchill
spellingShingle Act of Union 1707; union of England and Scotland; Court; Queen Anne; Sidney Godolphin; Robert Harley; John Churchill
Taylor, Michael
The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland
title The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland
title_full The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland
title_fullStr The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland
title_full_unstemmed The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland
title_short The British Court and the 1707 Union of England and Scotland
title_sort british court and the 1707 union of england and scotland
topic Act of Union 1707; union of England and Scotland; Court; Queen Anne; Sidney Godolphin; Robert Harley; John Churchill
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/76438/