Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture

Aims: The ability to plan-ahead allows us to focus our attention at an early stage of processing and is said to facilitate our ability to ignore distractions. This thesis aimed to track the development of endogenous control across the lifespan and assess if this skill can prevent attentional capture...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hayre, R.K.
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/66976/
_version_ 1848800373175746560
author Hayre, R.K.
author_facet Hayre, R.K.
author_sort Hayre, R.K.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Aims: The ability to plan-ahead allows us to focus our attention at an early stage of processing and is said to facilitate our ability to ignore distractions. This thesis aimed to track the development of endogenous control across the lifespan and assess if this skill can prevent attentional capture from a salient distraction. I used the Cued Visual Search task to understand whether children and adults can maintain early cues to guide their attention towards a target and suppress a salient distracter. Chapters 2-7: In Chapter 2, I designed and validated whether a shape singleton distracter could produce attentional capture. I included this item in the Cued Visual Search task introduced in Chapter 3 where I compared children’s (5-6 & 9-11 years) and young adults’ performance when endogenous cue-utilisation was encouraged vs discouraged. In Chapter 4, I examined the possibility of cross-colour priming effects within the Cued Visual Search task. Chapter 5 considered the role of block predictiveness for encouraging endogenous cue-use in children. In Chapter 6, I assessed if this skill is used similarly in the Cued Visual Search task and the AX-Continuous Performance Task in young and older adults. Chapter 7 manipulated search difficulty for a complex target to enhance cue-use and reduce capture. Conclusions: The results suggest that endogenous control is still developing in early-childhood (5-6 years) but becomes adult-like by mid-childhood (9-11 years) and does not decline in seniority. Immature forms of this skill (5-6 years) are able to maintain an early task-goal but it is less effective under highly distracting situations. Indeed, this domain-specific skill is enacted differently depending on the demands of the task. Contrary to predictions, endogenous cue-utilisation was unable to prevent attentional capture at an early point in processing in children and adults but was reduced at a late point in processing. One reason for this could be due to the independence found between maintenance and inhibition abilities in Cued Visual Search from mid- childhood and onwards. Endogenous cues may create a variable task-goal that changes on a trial-by-trial basis, which make it difficult to suppress a distraction at an early stage of processing but this may reactivate the task-goal in the moment to avoid further capture. Overall, this thesis emphasises the development and limits of endogenous cue-utilisation for selectively focusing our attention.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:50:32Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-66976
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:50:32Z
publishDate 2021
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-669762025-02-28T15:13:47Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/66976/ Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture Hayre, R.K. Aims: The ability to plan-ahead allows us to focus our attention at an early stage of processing and is said to facilitate our ability to ignore distractions. This thesis aimed to track the development of endogenous control across the lifespan and assess if this skill can prevent attentional capture from a salient distraction. I used the Cued Visual Search task to understand whether children and adults can maintain early cues to guide their attention towards a target and suppress a salient distracter. Chapters 2-7: In Chapter 2, I designed and validated whether a shape singleton distracter could produce attentional capture. I included this item in the Cued Visual Search task introduced in Chapter 3 where I compared children’s (5-6 & 9-11 years) and young adults’ performance when endogenous cue-utilisation was encouraged vs discouraged. In Chapter 4, I examined the possibility of cross-colour priming effects within the Cued Visual Search task. Chapter 5 considered the role of block predictiveness for encouraging endogenous cue-use in children. In Chapter 6, I assessed if this skill is used similarly in the Cued Visual Search task and the AX-Continuous Performance Task in young and older adults. Chapter 7 manipulated search difficulty for a complex target to enhance cue-use and reduce capture. Conclusions: The results suggest that endogenous control is still developing in early-childhood (5-6 years) but becomes adult-like by mid-childhood (9-11 years) and does not decline in seniority. Immature forms of this skill (5-6 years) are able to maintain an early task-goal but it is less effective under highly distracting situations. Indeed, this domain-specific skill is enacted differently depending on the demands of the task. Contrary to predictions, endogenous cue-utilisation was unable to prevent attentional capture at an early point in processing in children and adults but was reduced at a late point in processing. One reason for this could be due to the independence found between maintenance and inhibition abilities in Cued Visual Search from mid- childhood and onwards. Endogenous cues may create a variable task-goal that changes on a trial-by-trial basis, which make it difficult to suppress a distraction at an early stage of processing but this may reactivate the task-goal in the moment to avoid further capture. Overall, this thesis emphasises the development and limits of endogenous cue-utilisation for selectively focusing our attention. 2021-12-31 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/66976/1/Thesis_Final_RH_Corrected.pdf Hayre, R.K. (2021) Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Child development; attention; distraction; attentional capture; cognitive control; visual search; endogenous control
spellingShingle Child development; attention; distraction; attentional capture; cognitive control; visual search; endogenous control
Hayre, R.K.
Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture
title Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture
title_full Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture
title_fullStr Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture
title_full_unstemmed Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture
title_short Developmental Differences in Endogenous Control & Attentional Capture
title_sort developmental differences in endogenous control & attentional capture
topic Child development; attention; distraction; attentional capture; cognitive control; visual search; endogenous control
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/66976/