How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?

The issues surrounding Too-Big-To-Fail (TBTF) banks has been unrelenting. This dissertation conducts detailed analysis surrounding their origins, and the reasons for which their existence has been permitted. This is despite the extreme disruptions that they caused during the Global Financial Crisis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simmons, Ben Oren
Format: Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2020
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/63287/
_version_ 1848800011048976384
author Simmons, Ben Oren
author_facet Simmons, Ben Oren
author_sort Simmons, Ben Oren
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The issues surrounding Too-Big-To-Fail (TBTF) banks has been unrelenting. This dissertation conducts detailed analysis surrounding their origins, and the reasons for which their existence has been permitted. This is despite the extreme disruptions that they caused during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). This involves investigating whether TBTF banks intentionally acted differently and why this has not been rectified by regulation and other forms of deterrents. Chronologically, an investigation will be conducted into the origins of the TBTF nomenclature, followed by an assessment of the literature which investigated whether banks intentionally increased their size to abuse the intrinsic benefits TBTF banks receive. Additionally, a highlighted theme of investigation surrounds the increasing need to stem the moral hazard problem innate with the abuse of power, through the creation of Mortgage-Backed Securities rife with subprime mortgages. A primary case study involves Lehman Brothers, whom whilst considered TBTF, was not bailed out. In the meantime, banks such as Bear Stearns who behaved in a similar way, were bailed out and sold to JP Morgan. This led to investigations regarding the vehicles used to aid the recovery of the GFC, primarily TARP and ‘Bad Banks’. As my research demonstrates, both these fell short in providing adequate recovery for the economy, in addition to the Basel II Accords which were in place at the time. The resulting research aims to suggest whether regulation enacted post-GFC, namely the Basel III Accords and Dodd-Frank Act, as well as punishments and fines, has sufficiently eradicated the perplexing TBTF issue.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:44:46Z
format Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-63287
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:44:46Z
publishDate 2020
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-632872021-06-08T11:28:24Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/63287/ How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably? Simmons, Ben Oren The issues surrounding Too-Big-To-Fail (TBTF) banks has been unrelenting. This dissertation conducts detailed analysis surrounding their origins, and the reasons for which their existence has been permitted. This is despite the extreme disruptions that they caused during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). This involves investigating whether TBTF banks intentionally acted differently and why this has not been rectified by regulation and other forms of deterrents. Chronologically, an investigation will be conducted into the origins of the TBTF nomenclature, followed by an assessment of the literature which investigated whether banks intentionally increased their size to abuse the intrinsic benefits TBTF banks receive. Additionally, a highlighted theme of investigation surrounds the increasing need to stem the moral hazard problem innate with the abuse of power, through the creation of Mortgage-Backed Securities rife with subprime mortgages. A primary case study involves Lehman Brothers, whom whilst considered TBTF, was not bailed out. In the meantime, banks such as Bear Stearns who behaved in a similar way, were bailed out and sold to JP Morgan. This led to investigations regarding the vehicles used to aid the recovery of the GFC, primarily TARP and ‘Bad Banks’. As my research demonstrates, both these fell short in providing adequate recovery for the economy, in addition to the Basel II Accords which were in place at the time. The resulting research aims to suggest whether regulation enacted post-GFC, namely the Basel III Accords and Dodd-Frank Act, as well as punishments and fines, has sufficiently eradicated the perplexing TBTF issue. 2020-12-01 Dissertation (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/63287/1/14288124_BUSI4109_TBTF%20Bank%20Risk%20Attitude%20and%20Regulatory%20Intervention%20Dissertation.docx Simmons, Ben Oren (2020) How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably? [Dissertation (University of Nottingham only)]
spellingShingle Simmons, Ben Oren
How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?
title How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?
title_full How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?
title_fullStr How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?
title_full_unstemmed How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?
title_short How did a bank’s Too-Big-To-Fail status impact its risk attitude during the Global Financial Crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?
title_sort how did a bank’s too-big-to-fail status impact its risk attitude during the global financial crisis and has regulatory intervention rectified these issues suitably?
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/63287/