The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour

This study shows that different belief concepts within the same religion can have different effects on distributive behaviour. A dictator game experiment measures the causal effects of the concepts of God and Jesus on both the pro-sociality of Christians and their propensity to discriminate against...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lane, Tom
Format: Monograph
Language:English
Published: University of Nottingham 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/57137/
_version_ 1848799438595686400
author Lane, Tom
author_facet Lane, Tom
author_sort Lane, Tom
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This study shows that different belief concepts within the same religion can have different effects on distributive behaviour. A dictator game experiment measures the causal effects of the concepts of God and Jesus on both the pro-sociality of Christians and their propensity to discriminate against LGBTQ people. The concept of Jesus significantly raises the amounts Christians donate, but the concept of God does not. Christians are found, at borderline significance, to discriminate against LGBTQ people, but this discrimination is not significantly increased by the concepts of Jesus or God. Neither concept significantly affects the behaviour of a non-Christian sample.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:35:40Z
format Monograph
id nottingham-57137
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:35:40Z
publishDate 2019
publisher University of Nottingham
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-571372021-06-01T07:52:22Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/57137/ The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour Lane, Tom This study shows that different belief concepts within the same religion can have different effects on distributive behaviour. A dictator game experiment measures the causal effects of the concepts of God and Jesus on both the pro-sociality of Christians and their propensity to discriminate against LGBTQ people. The concept of Jesus significantly raises the amounts Christians donate, but the concept of God does not. Christians are found, at borderline significance, to discriminate against LGBTQ people, but this discrimination is not significantly increased by the concepts of Jesus or God. Neither concept significantly affects the behaviour of a non-Christian sample. University of Nottingham 2019-07-18 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/57137/1/Economics%20Working%20Paper%20Series-Behavioural%20and%20Experimental%20Economics-B8.pdf Lane, Tom (2019) The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour. Working Paper. University of Nottingham. (Unpublished) Christianity; Dictator Game; Pro-sociality; Discrimination; LGBTQ
spellingShingle Christianity; Dictator Game; Pro-sociality; Discrimination; LGBTQ
Lane, Tom
The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour
title The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour
title_full The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour
title_fullStr The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour
title_full_unstemmed The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour
title_short The differential effects of Jesus and God on distributive behaviour
title_sort differential effects of jesus and god on distributive behaviour
topic Christianity; Dictator Game; Pro-sociality; Discrimination; LGBTQ
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/57137/