The geography of Chinese science

Chinese scientific output has increased dramatically in recent years, but its internal spatial structure has received scant attention. Estimated gravity models of intercity scientific co-authorships show that there are two types of spatial political bias in China, apart from the expected mass and di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andersson, David Emanuel, Find, Søren, Gunessee, Saileshsingh, Matthiessen, Christian Wichmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/56391/
_version_ 1848799322063241216
author Andersson, David Emanuel
Find, Søren
Gunessee, Saileshsingh
Matthiessen, Christian Wichmann
author_facet Andersson, David Emanuel
Find, Søren
Gunessee, Saileshsingh
Matthiessen, Christian Wichmann
author_sort Andersson, David Emanuel
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Chinese scientific output has increased dramatically in recent years, but its internal spatial structure has received scant attention. Estimated gravity models of intercity scientific co-authorships show that there are two types of spatial political bias in China, apart from the expected mass and distance effects. Intercity co-authorships involving Beijing are more common than Beijing’s output volume and location would imply, and this Beijing bias is increasing over time. The second type of spatial political bias is greater intra-provincial collaboration than is accounted for by size and distance. The geography of Chinese science is thus not only monocentric as regards overall scientific output, but also exhibits unusually hierarchical collaboration patterns. Unlike in Europe and North America, national and regional capitals are becoming ever more important as scientific coordination centers.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:33:49Z
format Article
id nottingham-56391
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:33:49Z
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-563912019-04-01T13:01:19Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/56391/ The geography of Chinese science Andersson, David Emanuel Find, Søren Gunessee, Saileshsingh Matthiessen, Christian Wichmann Chinese scientific output has increased dramatically in recent years, but its internal spatial structure has received scant attention. Estimated gravity models of intercity scientific co-authorships show that there are two types of spatial political bias in China, apart from the expected mass and distance effects. Intercity co-authorships involving Beijing are more common than Beijing’s output volume and location would imply, and this Beijing bias is increasing over time. The second type of spatial political bias is greater intra-provincial collaboration than is accounted for by size and distance. The geography of Chinese science is thus not only monocentric as regards overall scientific output, but also exhibits unusually hierarchical collaboration patterns. Unlike in Europe and North America, national and regional capitals are becoming ever more important as scientific coordination centers. SAGE Publications 2014-12-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/56391/1/The%20Geography%20of%20Chinese%20Science%20-%20AAM.pdf Andersson, David Emanuel, Find, Søren, Gunessee, Saileshsingh and Matthiessen, Christian Wichmann (2014) The geography of Chinese science. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46 (12). pp. 2950-2971. ISSN 0308-518X scientific collaboration; network ; China; spatial political bias https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a130283p doi:10.1068/a130283p doi:10.1068/a130283p
spellingShingle scientific collaboration; network
; China; spatial political bias
Andersson, David Emanuel
Find, Søren
Gunessee, Saileshsingh
Matthiessen, Christian Wichmann
The geography of Chinese science
title The geography of Chinese science
title_full The geography of Chinese science
title_fullStr The geography of Chinese science
title_full_unstemmed The geography of Chinese science
title_short The geography of Chinese science
title_sort geography of chinese science
topic scientific collaboration; network
; China; spatial political bias
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/56391/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/56391/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/56391/