When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think

There is increasing awareness that the nutritional status of women at the onset of pregnancy can have a profound effect on the general health and well-being of children. However, recent analyses indicate that the majority of women from different socioeconomic backgrounds are ill prepared for the nut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sinclair, Kevin D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Academy of Sciences 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/54965/
_version_ 1848799090967576576
author Sinclair, Kevin D.
author_facet Sinclair, Kevin D.
author_sort Sinclair, Kevin D.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description There is increasing awareness that the nutritional status of women at the onset of pregnancy can have a profound effect on the general health and well-being of children. However, recent analyses indicate that the majority of women from different socioeconomic backgrounds are ill prepared for the nutritional rigors of pregnancy, and that outcomes of dietary interventions once pregnancy has commenced are usually disappointing (1). It follows that current thinking is moving toward more targeted dietary advice for intending parents with the aim of improving nutritional status by the time of conception. There is certainly compelling evidence from animal studies to identify this as perhaps the most critical stage of mammalian development: one that is acutely sensitive to subtle alterations in maternal diet with far-reaching consequences for the development of late-onset noncommunicable diseases (2, 3). However, to date, animal studies have focused, for the most part, on aspects of cardiometabolic health. In PNAS, Gould et al. (4) report that modest protein restriction (a low-protein diet) in mice limited to the period of preimplantation embryo development (termed Emb-LPD) initially leads to a reduction in the population of neural stem cells but then, upon dietary realignment, subsequently results in an enhancement of neuronal differentiation within higher regions of the fetal brain. Furthermore, they report that this apparently early adaptive response ultimately leads to deficits of short-term memory in young-adult offspring. These observations therefore greatly extend those of previous studies on brain function, which have generally explored the effects of dietary restriction throughout gestation and lactation (5), to highlight the importance of nutrition during the periconceptional period.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:30:09Z
format Article
id nottingham-54965
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:30:09Z
publishDate 2018
publisher National Academy of Sciences
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-549652019-01-05T04:30:17Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/54965/ When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think Sinclair, Kevin D. There is increasing awareness that the nutritional status of women at the onset of pregnancy can have a profound effect on the general health and well-being of children. However, recent analyses indicate that the majority of women from different socioeconomic backgrounds are ill prepared for the nutritional rigors of pregnancy, and that outcomes of dietary interventions once pregnancy has commenced are usually disappointing (1). It follows that current thinking is moving toward more targeted dietary advice for intending parents with the aim of improving nutritional status by the time of conception. There is certainly compelling evidence from animal studies to identify this as perhaps the most critical stage of mammalian development: one that is acutely sensitive to subtle alterations in maternal diet with far-reaching consequences for the development of late-onset noncommunicable diseases (2, 3). However, to date, animal studies have focused, for the most part, on aspects of cardiometabolic health. In PNAS, Gould et al. (4) report that modest protein restriction (a low-protein diet) in mice limited to the period of preimplantation embryo development (termed Emb-LPD) initially leads to a reduction in the population of neural stem cells but then, upon dietary realignment, subsequently results in an enhancement of neuronal differentiation within higher regions of the fetal brain. Furthermore, they report that this apparently early adaptive response ultimately leads to deficits of short-term memory in young-adult offspring. These observations therefore greatly extend those of previous studies on brain function, which have generally explored the effects of dietary restriction throughout gestation and lactation (5), to highlight the importance of nutrition during the periconceptional period. National Academy of Sciences 2018-07-31 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/54965/1/7852.full.pdf Sinclair, Kevin D. (2018) When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (31). pp. 7852-7854. ISSN 1091-6490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809471115 doi:10.1073/pnas.1809471115 doi:10.1073/pnas.1809471115
spellingShingle Sinclair, Kevin D.
When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think
title When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think
title_full When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think
title_fullStr When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think
title_full_unstemmed When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think
title_short When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think
title_sort when maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it’s time to think
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/54965/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/54965/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/54965/