The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure

We recall the experimental approaches involved in the discovery of hydrogen bonds in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) made 70 years ago by a team of scientists at University College Nottingham led by J.M. Gulland, and in relation to previous studies. This discovery proved an important step in the elucida...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harding, Stephen E., Channell, Guy Andrew, Phillips-Jones, Mary K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Portland Press 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53506/
_version_ 1848798951369605120
author Harding, Stephen E.
Channell, Guy Andrew
Phillips-Jones, Mary K.
author_facet Harding, Stephen E.
Channell, Guy Andrew
Phillips-Jones, Mary K.
author_sort Harding, Stephen E.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description We recall the experimental approaches involved in the discovery of hydrogen bonds in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) made 70 years ago by a team of scientists at University College Nottingham led by J.M. Gulland, and in relation to previous studies. This discovery proved an important step in the elucidation of the correct structure for DNA made by J.D. Watson and F.H.C. Crick, as acknowledged in ‘The Double Helix’. At that time of the discovery, however, it was impossible to delineate between inter- and intra-chain hydrogen bonds. We also consider in the light of more recent hydrodynamic theory a tentative model for DNA proposed by Gulland’s and D.O. Jordan’s PhD student J.M. Creeth in his PhD thesis of 1948, with the correct prediction of two chains with a sugar-phosphate backbone on the exterior and hydrogen-bonded bases between the nucleotide bases of opposite chains in the interior. Our analysis shows that his incorporation of alternating breaks in the two-chain structure was not necessary to explain the viscosity data on scission of hydrogen bonds after titrating to high or low pH. Although Creeth’s model is a depiction of DNA structure alone, he could not know whether the hydrogen bonding was intermolecular, although this was subsequently proved correct by others. The mechanisms by which replicative processes occurred were of course unknown at that time, and so, he could not have realised how closely his tentative model resembled steps in some viral replicative mechanisms involving the molecule of life that he was working on.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:27:56Z
format Article
id nottingham-53506
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:27:56Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Portland Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-535062018-11-01T09:07:09Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53506/ The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure Harding, Stephen E. Channell, Guy Andrew Phillips-Jones, Mary K. We recall the experimental approaches involved in the discovery of hydrogen bonds in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) made 70 years ago by a team of scientists at University College Nottingham led by J.M. Gulland, and in relation to previous studies. This discovery proved an important step in the elucidation of the correct structure for DNA made by J.D. Watson and F.H.C. Crick, as acknowledged in ‘The Double Helix’. At that time of the discovery, however, it was impossible to delineate between inter- and intra-chain hydrogen bonds. We also consider in the light of more recent hydrodynamic theory a tentative model for DNA proposed by Gulland’s and D.O. Jordan’s PhD student J.M. Creeth in his PhD thesis of 1948, with the correct prediction of two chains with a sugar-phosphate backbone on the exterior and hydrogen-bonded bases between the nucleotide bases of opposite chains in the interior. Our analysis shows that his incorporation of alternating breaks in the two-chain structure was not necessary to explain the viscosity data on scission of hydrogen bonds after titrating to high or low pH. Although Creeth’s model is a depiction of DNA structure alone, he could not know whether the hydrogen bonding was intermolecular, although this was subsequently proved correct by others. The mechanisms by which replicative processes occurred were of course unknown at that time, and so, he could not have realised how closely his tentative model resembled steps in some viral replicative mechanisms involving the molecule of life that he was working on. Portland Press 2018-09-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53506/7/BST20180158.full.pdf Harding, Stephen E., Channell, Guy Andrew and Phillips-Jones, Mary K. (2018) The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure. Biochemical Society Transactions, 46 (5). pp. 1171-1182. ISSN 1470-8752 http://www.biochemsoctrans.org/content/early/2018/09/05/BST20180158 doi:10.1042/BST20180158 doi:10.1042/BST20180158
spellingShingle Harding, Stephen E.
Channell, Guy Andrew
Phillips-Jones, Mary K.
The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure
title The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure
title_full The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure
title_fullStr The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure
title_full_unstemmed The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure
title_short The discovery of hydrogen bonds in DNA and a re-evaluation of the 1948 Creeth two-chain model for its structure
title_sort discovery of hydrogen bonds in dna and a re-evaluation of the 1948 creeth two-chain model for its structure
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53506/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53506/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53506/