Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing

Introduction Research into interventions to improve health and wellbeing for older people living in care homes is increasingly common. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is frequently used as an outcome measure but collecting both self-reported and proxy HRQoL measures is challenging in this se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Usman, Adeela, Lewis, Sarah, Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn, Long, Annabelle, Housley, Gemma, Jordan, Jake, Gage, Heather, Dening, Tom, Gladman, John R.F., Gordon, Adam L.
Format: Article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53179/
_version_ 1848798895165931520
author Usman, Adeela
Lewis, Sarah
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Long, Annabelle
Housley, Gemma
Jordan, Jake
Gage, Heather
Dening, Tom
Gladman, John R.F.
Gordon, Adam L.
author_facet Usman, Adeela
Lewis, Sarah
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Long, Annabelle
Housley, Gemma
Jordan, Jake
Gage, Heather
Dening, Tom
Gladman, John R.F.
Gordon, Adam L.
author_sort Usman, Adeela
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Introduction Research into interventions to improve health and wellbeing for older people living in care homes is increasingly common. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is frequently used as an outcome measure but collecting both self-reported and proxy HRQoL measures is challenging in this setting. This study will investigate the reliability of UK care home staff as proxy respondents for the EQ-5D-5L and HowRu measures. Methods and Analysis This is a prospective cohort study of a sub-population of care home residents recruited to the larger Proactive Healthcare for Older People in Care Homes (PEACH) study. It will recruit residents ≥ 60 years across 24 care homes and not receiving short stay or respite care. The sample size is 160 participants. Resident and care home staff proxy EQ-5D-5L and HowRu responses will be collected monthly for three months. Weighted kappa statistics and intraclass correlation adjusted for clustering at the care home level will be used to measure agreement between resident and proxy responses. The extent to which staff variables (gender, age group, length of time caring, role, how well they know the resident, length of time working in care homes and in specialist gerontological practice) influence the level of agreement between self-reported and proxy responses will be considered using a multilevel mixed-effect regression model. Ethics and Dissemination The PEACH study protocol was reviewed by the UK Health Research Authority and University of Nottingham Research Ethics Committee and was determined to be a service development project. We will publish this study in a peer-reviewed journal with international readership and disseminate it through relevant national stakeholder networks and specialist societies.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:27:02Z
format Article
id nottingham-53179
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:27:02Z
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-531792020-05-04T19:47:27Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53179/ Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing Usman, Adeela Lewis, Sarah Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn Long, Annabelle Housley, Gemma Jordan, Jake Gage, Heather Dening, Tom Gladman, John R.F. Gordon, Adam L. Introduction Research into interventions to improve health and wellbeing for older people living in care homes is increasingly common. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is frequently used as an outcome measure but collecting both self-reported and proxy HRQoL measures is challenging in this setting. This study will investigate the reliability of UK care home staff as proxy respondents for the EQ-5D-5L and HowRu measures. Methods and Analysis This is a prospective cohort study of a sub-population of care home residents recruited to the larger Proactive Healthcare for Older People in Care Homes (PEACH) study. It will recruit residents ≥ 60 years across 24 care homes and not receiving short stay or respite care. The sample size is 160 participants. Resident and care home staff proxy EQ-5D-5L and HowRu responses will be collected monthly for three months. Weighted kappa statistics and intraclass correlation adjusted for clustering at the care home level will be used to measure agreement between resident and proxy responses. The extent to which staff variables (gender, age group, length of time caring, role, how well they know the resident, length of time working in care homes and in specialist gerontological practice) influence the level of agreement between self-reported and proxy responses will be considered using a multilevel mixed-effect regression model. Ethics and Dissemination The PEACH study protocol was reviewed by the UK Health Research Authority and University of Nottingham Research Ethics Committee and was determined to be a service development project. We will publish this study in a peer-reviewed journal with international readership and disseminate it through relevant national stakeholder networks and specialist societies. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2018-07-17 Article PeerReviewed Usman, Adeela, Lewis, Sarah, Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn, Long, Annabelle, Housley, Gemma, Jordan, Jake, Gage, Heather, Dening, Tom, Gladman, John R.F. and Gordon, Adam L. (2018) Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing. BMJ Open, 8 (8). e022127/1-e022127/6. ISSN 2044-6055 https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/8/e022127 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022127 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022127
spellingShingle Usman, Adeela
Lewis, Sarah
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Long, Annabelle
Housley, Gemma
Jordan, Jake
Gage, Heather
Dening, Tom
Gladman, John R.F.
Gordon, Adam L.
Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing
title Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing
title_full Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing
title_fullStr Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing
title_full_unstemmed Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing
title_short Measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for EQ-5D-5L and HowRu: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing
title_sort measuring health related quality of life of care home residents, comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses for eq-5d-5l and howru: protocol for assessing proxy reliability in care home outcome testing
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53179/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53179/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/53179/