Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment
While legal and policy frameworks are based on a clear distinction between public and private security actors and functions, the reality on the ground in Indonesia reveals that there is a high level of corporate capture of public security services, including the military and police, who often operat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52936/ |
| _version_ | 1848798842769637376 |
|---|---|
| author | White, Nigel D. Footer, Mary E. Senior, Kerry Dorp, Mark van Kiezebrink, Vincent Wasi Gede Puraka, Y. Anzas, Ayudya |
| author_facet | White, Nigel D. Footer, Mary E. Senior, Kerry Dorp, Mark van Kiezebrink, Vincent Wasi Gede Puraka, Y. Anzas, Ayudya |
| author_sort | White, Nigel D. |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | While legal and policy frameworks are based on a clear distinction between public and private security actors and functions, the reality on the ground in Indonesia reveals that there is a high level of corporate capture of public security services, including the military and police, who often operate alongside private security companies (mainly local, though there is some evidence of an emerging international presence), and the security personnel of companies engaged in the natural resources industry. This has led to serious human rights violations of indigenous peoples and other local inhabitants, who often find themselves entangled in protracted conflicts with multinational companies over access to their land. Two case studies involving fieldwork in the logging and palm oil sectors in Sumatra reveal a pernicious and deliberate erosion and violation of rights of local inhabitants across the spectrum of security actors, showing that public security actors are protecting corporate interests rather than performing public functions. The implications of these findings are considered in terms of legal responsibilities as well as access to justice. The article reasons towards what are argued to be necessary legal and policy changes. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:26:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-52936 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:26:12Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Springer |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-529362020-05-04T19:46:18Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52936/ Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment White, Nigel D. Footer, Mary E. Senior, Kerry Dorp, Mark van Kiezebrink, Vincent Wasi Gede Puraka, Y. Anzas, Ayudya While legal and policy frameworks are based on a clear distinction between public and private security actors and functions, the reality on the ground in Indonesia reveals that there is a high level of corporate capture of public security services, including the military and police, who often operate alongside private security companies (mainly local, though there is some evidence of an emerging international presence), and the security personnel of companies engaged in the natural resources industry. This has led to serious human rights violations of indigenous peoples and other local inhabitants, who often find themselves entangled in protracted conflicts with multinational companies over access to their land. Two case studies involving fieldwork in the logging and palm oil sectors in Sumatra reveal a pernicious and deliberate erosion and violation of rights of local inhabitants across the spectrum of security actors, showing that public security actors are protecting corporate interests rather than performing public functions. The implications of these findings are considered in terms of legal responsibilities as well as access to justice. The article reasons towards what are argued to be necessary legal and policy changes. Springer 2018-07-31 Article PeerReviewed White, Nigel D., Footer, Mary E., Senior, Kerry, Dorp, Mark van, Kiezebrink, Vincent, Wasi Gede Puraka, Y. and Anzas, Ayudya (2018) Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment. Netherlands International Law Review, 65 (2). pp. 217-252. ISSN 1741-6191 Accountability; Corporate capture; Corporate-community conflict; Human rights; Indonesia; Land rights; Logging; Private military and security companies; Natural resources industry; Palm oil; Public-private security; Responsibility https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40802-018-0107-8 doi:10.1007/s40802-018-0107-8 doi:10.1007/s40802-018-0107-8 |
| spellingShingle | Accountability; Corporate capture; Corporate-community conflict; Human rights; Indonesia; Land rights; Logging; Private military and security companies; Natural resources industry; Palm oil; Public-private security; Responsibility White, Nigel D. Footer, Mary E. Senior, Kerry Dorp, Mark van Kiezebrink, Vincent Wasi Gede Puraka, Y. Anzas, Ayudya Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment |
| title | Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment |
| title_full | Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment |
| title_fullStr | Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment |
| title_short | Blurring public and private security in Indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment |
| title_sort | blurring public and private security in indonesia: corporate interests and human rights in a fragile environment |
| topic | Accountability; Corporate capture; Corporate-community conflict; Human rights; Indonesia; Land rights; Logging; Private military and security companies; Natural resources industry; Palm oil; Public-private security; Responsibility |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52936/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52936/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52936/ |