The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories

This article examines the applicability of the European Convention for Human Rights (ECHR) when a State loses control over parts of its territory. It argues that the jurisprudence of the European Court for Human Rights, which insists on residual positive obligations based in sovereign title over ter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milanovic, Marko, Papić, Tatjana
Format: Article
Published: Cambridge University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52908/
_version_ 1848798837911584768
author Milanovic, Marko
Papić, Tatjana
author_facet Milanovic, Marko
Papić, Tatjana
author_sort Milanovic, Marko
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This article examines the applicability of the European Convention for Human Rights (ECHR) when a State loses control over parts of its territory. It argues that the jurisprudence of the European Court for Human Rights, which insists on residual positive obligations based in sovereign title over territory, is problematic and needs to be rethought. The Court’s current approach is not only likely to provoke backlash, since it requires it to decide politically explosive questions of sovereign title, but does so for very little practical benefit for the protection of human rights. The article therefore explores more preferable alternatives.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:26:07Z
format Article
id nottingham-52908
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:26:07Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-529082020-05-04T19:44:37Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52908/ The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories Milanovic, Marko Papić, Tatjana This article examines the applicability of the European Convention for Human Rights (ECHR) when a State loses control over parts of its territory. It argues that the jurisprudence of the European Court for Human Rights, which insists on residual positive obligations based in sovereign title over territory, is problematic and needs to be rethought. The Court’s current approach is not only likely to provoke backlash, since it requires it to decide politically explosive questions of sovereign title, but does so for very little practical benefit for the protection of human rights. The article therefore explores more preferable alternatives. Cambridge University Press 2018-08-16 Article PeerReviewed Milanovic, Marko and Papić, Tatjana (2018) The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories. International and Comparative Law Quarterly . ISSN 1471-6895 Jurisdiction; Responsibility; ECHR; European Court of Human Rights; Sovereignty; Positive obligations; Kosovo; Georgia; Ukraine; Russia; Crimea https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/applicability-of-the-echr-in-contested-territories/D7C0FF96AEFB19FB6D3D6D9F410608CA doi:10.1017/S0020589318000234 doi:10.1017/S0020589318000234
spellingShingle Jurisdiction; Responsibility; ECHR; European Court of Human Rights; Sovereignty; Positive obligations; Kosovo; Georgia; Ukraine; Russia; Crimea
Milanovic, Marko
Papić, Tatjana
The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories
title The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories
title_full The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories
title_fullStr The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories
title_full_unstemmed The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories
title_short The applicability of the ECHR in contested territories
title_sort applicability of the echr in contested territories
topic Jurisdiction; Responsibility; ECHR; European Court of Human Rights; Sovereignty; Positive obligations; Kosovo; Georgia; Ukraine; Russia; Crimea
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52908/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52908/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52908/