Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation

The ‘modifiable areal unit problem’ is prevalent across many aspects of spatial analysis within ecology and conservation. The problem is particularly manifest when calculating metrics for extinction risk estimation, for example, area of occupancy (AOO).Although embedded into the International Union...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moat, Justin, Bachman, Steven P., Field, Richard, Boyd, Doreen S.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52481/
_version_ 1848798735870459904
author Moat, Justin
Bachman, Steven P.
Field, Richard
Boyd, Doreen S.
author_facet Moat, Justin
Bachman, Steven P.
Field, Richard
Boyd, Doreen S.
author_sort Moat, Justin
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The ‘modifiable areal unit problem’ is prevalent across many aspects of spatial analysis within ecology and conservation. The problem is particularly manifest when calculating metrics for extinction risk estimation, for example, area of occupancy (AOO).Although embedded into the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List criteria, AOO is often not used or is poorly applied. Here we evaluate new and existing methods for calculating AOO from occurrence records and present a method for determining the minimum AOO using a uniform grid. We evaluate the grid cell shape, grid origin and grid rotation with both real-world and simulated data, reviewing the effects on AOO values, and possible impacts for species already assessed on the IUCN Red List. We show that AOO can vary by up to 80% and a ratio of cells to points of 1:1.21 gives the maximum variation in the number of occupied cells. These findings potentially impact 3% of existing species on the IUCN Red List, as well as species not yet assessed. We show that a new method that combines both grid rotation and moving grid origin gives fast, robust and reproducible results and, in the majority of cases, achieves the minimum AOO. As well as reporting minimum AOO, we outline a confidence interval which should be incorporated in to existing tools that support species risk assessment. We also make further recommendations for reporting AOO and other areal measurements within ecology, leading to more robust methods for future species risk assessment.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:24:30Z
format Article
id nottingham-52481
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:24:30Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-524812020-05-04T19:37:33Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52481/ Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation Moat, Justin Bachman, Steven P. Field, Richard Boyd, Doreen S. The ‘modifiable areal unit problem’ is prevalent across many aspects of spatial analysis within ecology and conservation. The problem is particularly manifest when calculating metrics for extinction risk estimation, for example, area of occupancy (AOO).Although embedded into the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List criteria, AOO is often not used or is poorly applied. Here we evaluate new and existing methods for calculating AOO from occurrence records and present a method for determining the minimum AOO using a uniform grid. We evaluate the grid cell shape, grid origin and grid rotation with both real-world and simulated data, reviewing the effects on AOO values, and possible impacts for species already assessed on the IUCN Red List. We show that AOO can vary by up to 80% and a ratio of cells to points of 1:1.21 gives the maximum variation in the number of occupied cells. These findings potentially impact 3% of existing species on the IUCN Red List, as well as species not yet assessed. We show that a new method that combines both grid rotation and moving grid origin gives fast, robust and reproducible results and, in the majority of cases, achieves the minimum AOO. As well as reporting minimum AOO, we outline a confidence interval which should be incorporated in to existing tools that support species risk assessment. We also make further recommendations for reporting AOO and other areal measurements within ecology, leading to more robust methods for future species risk assessment. Wiley 2018-05-23 Article PeerReviewed Moat, Justin, Bachman, Steven P., Field, Richard and Boyd, Doreen S. (2018) Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation. Conservation Biology . ISSN 1523-1739 IUCN Red List conservation assessments point data raster species distribution threatened species Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cobi.13139 doi:10.1111/cobi.13139 doi:10.1111/cobi.13139
spellingShingle IUCN Red List
conservation assessments
point data
raster
species distribution
threatened species
Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP)
Moat, Justin
Bachman, Steven P.
Field, Richard
Boyd, Doreen S.
Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation
title Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation
title_full Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation
title_fullStr Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation
title_full_unstemmed Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation
title_short Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation
title_sort refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation
topic IUCN Red List
conservation assessments
point data
raster
species distribution
threatened species
Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP)
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52481/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52481/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52481/