Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience

Objective The current study investigated the behaviour and visual attention of two groups of drivers with differing pedal cycling experience (pedal cyclists and non-pedal cyclists), towards vulnerable road users at junctions in a driving simulator. Background Pedal cyclists and motorcyclists a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robbins, Chloe J., Chapman, Peter
Format: Article
Published: Sage 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52443/
_version_ 1848798726398672896
author Robbins, Chloe J.
Chapman, Peter
author_facet Robbins, Chloe J.
Chapman, Peter
author_sort Robbins, Chloe J.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective The current study investigated the behaviour and visual attention of two groups of drivers with differing pedal cycling experience (pedal cyclists and non-pedal cyclists), towards vulnerable road users at junctions in a driving simulator. Background Pedal cyclists and motorcyclists are involved in a disproportionate number of crashes given the distance they travel, with a high proportion of these crashes occurring at junctions. Many studies have found that car drivers who also hold a motorcycle licence have increased awareness towards motorcycles. Method The task involved approaching a T-junction and turning right when it was deemed to be safe. In Study 1 the junction was controlled by a give way sign, and in Study 2 the junction was controlled by a stop sign. Each T-junction contained a target vehicle (car, motorcycle or pedal cycle), approaching from a near, medium or far distance from the junction. Results Participants did not look at pedal cycles approaching from a far distance for as long as they looked at approaching motorcycles and cars, despite all vehicles travelling at identical speeds. No differences were found between pedal cyclists and non-pedal cyclists on any visual attention measures, indicating that pedal cycling experience was not associated with differences in drivers’ attention towards pedal cycles. Conclusions Findings have implications for road safety, demonstrating subtle differences in drivers’ every day visual attention towards differing vehicle types. Application This research has the potential to inform the development of in-car technical assistive systems, improving the safety of vulnerable road users at junctions.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:24:21Z
format Article
id nottingham-52443
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:24:21Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Sage
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-524432020-05-04T19:40:55Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52443/ Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience Robbins, Chloe J. Chapman, Peter Objective The current study investigated the behaviour and visual attention of two groups of drivers with differing pedal cycling experience (pedal cyclists and non-pedal cyclists), towards vulnerable road users at junctions in a driving simulator. Background Pedal cyclists and motorcyclists are involved in a disproportionate number of crashes given the distance they travel, with a high proportion of these crashes occurring at junctions. Many studies have found that car drivers who also hold a motorcycle licence have increased awareness towards motorcycles. Method The task involved approaching a T-junction and turning right when it was deemed to be safe. In Study 1 the junction was controlled by a give way sign, and in Study 2 the junction was controlled by a stop sign. Each T-junction contained a target vehicle (car, motorcycle or pedal cycle), approaching from a near, medium or far distance from the junction. Results Participants did not look at pedal cycles approaching from a far distance for as long as they looked at approaching motorcycles and cars, despite all vehicles travelling at identical speeds. No differences were found between pedal cyclists and non-pedal cyclists on any visual attention measures, indicating that pedal cycling experience was not associated with differences in drivers’ attention towards pedal cycles. Conclusions Findings have implications for road safety, demonstrating subtle differences in drivers’ every day visual attention towards differing vehicle types. Application This research has the potential to inform the development of in-car technical assistive systems, improving the safety of vulnerable road users at junctions. Sage 2018-06-15 Article PeerReviewed Robbins, Chloe J. and Chapman, Peter (2018) Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience. Human Factors . ISSN 1547-8181 attentional processes; visual search; simulation; bicycle safety; eye tracking http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0018720818778960 doi:10.1177/0018720818778960 doi:10.1177/0018720818778960
spellingShingle attentional processes; visual search; simulation; bicycle safety; eye tracking
Robbins, Chloe J.
Chapman, Peter
Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience
title Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience
title_full Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience
title_fullStr Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience
title_full_unstemmed Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience
title_short Drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience
title_sort drivers’ visual search behavior toward vulnerable road users at junctions as a function of cycling experience
topic attentional processes; visual search; simulation; bicycle safety; eye tracking
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52443/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52443/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52443/