Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing

One of the strategies that researchers have used to investigate the role of sensorimotor information in lexical-semantic processing is to examine effects of words’ rated body-object interaction (BOI; the ease with which the human body can interact with a word’s referent). Processing tends to be faci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heard, Alison, Madan, Christopher R., Protzner, Andrea B., Pexman, Penny M.
Format: Article
Published: Springer 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52382/
_version_ 1848798713120555008
author Heard, Alison
Madan, Christopher R.
Protzner, Andrea B.
Pexman, Penny M.
author_facet Heard, Alison
Madan, Christopher R.
Protzner, Andrea B.
Pexman, Penny M.
author_sort Heard, Alison
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description One of the strategies that researchers have used to investigate the role of sensorimotor information in lexical-semantic processing is to examine effects of words’ rated body-object interaction (BOI; the ease with which the human body can interact with a word’s referent). Processing tends to be facilitated for words with high BOI compared to words with low BOI, across a wide variety of tasks. Such effects have been referenced in debates over the nature of semantic representations, but their theoretical import has been limited by the fact that BOI is a fairly coarse measure of sensorimotor experience with words’ referents. In the present study we collected ratings for 621 words on seven semantic dimensions (graspability, ease of pantomime, number of actions, animacy, size, danger, and usefulness) in order to investigate which attributes are most strongly related to BOI ratings, and to lexical-semantic processing. BOI ratings were obtained from previous norming studies (Bennett, Burnett, Siakaluk, & Pexman, 2011; Tillotson, Siakaluk, & Pexman, 2008) and measures of lexical-semantic processing were obtained from previous behavioural megastudies involving the semantic categorization task (concrete/abstract decision; Pexman, Heard, Lloyd, & Yap, 2017) and the lexical decision task (Balota et al., 2007). Results showed that the motor dimension of graspability, ease of pantomime, and number of actions were all related to BOI and that these dimensions together explained more variance in semantic processing than did BOI ratings alone. These ratings will be useful for researchers who wish to study how different kinds of bodily interactions influence lexical-semantic processing and cognition.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:24:08Z
format Article
id nottingham-52382
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:24:08Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-523822020-05-04T19:44:47Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52382/ Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing Heard, Alison Madan, Christopher R. Protzner, Andrea B. Pexman, Penny M. One of the strategies that researchers have used to investigate the role of sensorimotor information in lexical-semantic processing is to examine effects of words’ rated body-object interaction (BOI; the ease with which the human body can interact with a word’s referent). Processing tends to be facilitated for words with high BOI compared to words with low BOI, across a wide variety of tasks. Such effects have been referenced in debates over the nature of semantic representations, but their theoretical import has been limited by the fact that BOI is a fairly coarse measure of sensorimotor experience with words’ referents. In the present study we collected ratings for 621 words on seven semantic dimensions (graspability, ease of pantomime, number of actions, animacy, size, danger, and usefulness) in order to investigate which attributes are most strongly related to BOI ratings, and to lexical-semantic processing. BOI ratings were obtained from previous norming studies (Bennett, Burnett, Siakaluk, & Pexman, 2011; Tillotson, Siakaluk, & Pexman, 2008) and measures of lexical-semantic processing were obtained from previous behavioural megastudies involving the semantic categorization task (concrete/abstract decision; Pexman, Heard, Lloyd, & Yap, 2017) and the lexical decision task (Balota et al., 2007). Results showed that the motor dimension of graspability, ease of pantomime, and number of actions were all related to BOI and that these dimensions together explained more variance in semantic processing than did BOI ratings alone. These ratings will be useful for researchers who wish to study how different kinds of bodily interactions influence lexical-semantic processing and cognition. Springer 2018-07-02 Article PeerReviewed Heard, Alison, Madan, Christopher R., Protzner, Andrea B. and Pexman, Penny M. (2018) Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing. Behavior Research Methods . ISSN 1554-3528 Body-object interaction; Semantic decision task; Lexical decision task; Motor ratings; Visual word recognition https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1 doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1 doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1
spellingShingle Body-object interaction; Semantic decision task; Lexical decision task; Motor ratings; Visual word recognition
Heard, Alison
Madan, Christopher R.
Protzner, Andrea B.
Pexman, Penny M.
Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing
title Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing
title_full Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing
title_fullStr Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing
title_full_unstemmed Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing
title_short Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing
title_sort getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing
topic Body-object interaction; Semantic decision task; Lexical decision task; Motor ratings; Visual word recognition
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52382/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52382/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/52382/