Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery

This chapter explores the extent to which efforts to attain more reliable, comprehensive data and knowledge on forced labour could be impeded by a lack of critical reflexivity in the use of mainstream conventional definitional and conceptual frameworks. Drawing on textual and discourse analysis of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Okyere, Samuel
Other Authors: LeBaron, Genevieve
Format: Book Section
Published: Oxford University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51912/
_version_ 1848798601864544256
author Okyere, Samuel
author2 LeBaron, Genevieve
author_facet LeBaron, Genevieve
Okyere, Samuel
author_sort Okyere, Samuel
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This chapter explores the extent to which efforts to attain more reliable, comprehensive data and knowledge on forced labour could be impeded by a lack of critical reflexivity in the use of mainstream conventional definitional and conceptual frameworks. Drawing on textual and discourse analysis of dissemination materials from a study of forced labour, the chapter makes three key contributions. First, it argues that uncritical reliance on mainstream discourses reinforces their dominance and forecloses alternative conceptualisations, interpretations and understandings of the nature, causes and effects of forced labour. Second, the absence of critical reflexivity gives rise to methodological issues that adversely affect research validity, reliability and quality. Third, crucial empirical findings could be distorted or ignored where they contradict conventional discourses, interpretations and frameworks adopted for the research.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:22:22Z
format Book Section
id nottingham-51912
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:22:22Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-519122020-05-04T19:25:32Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51912/ Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery Okyere, Samuel This chapter explores the extent to which efforts to attain more reliable, comprehensive data and knowledge on forced labour could be impeded by a lack of critical reflexivity in the use of mainstream conventional definitional and conceptual frameworks. Drawing on textual and discourse analysis of dissemination materials from a study of forced labour, the chapter makes three key contributions. First, it argues that uncritical reliance on mainstream discourses reinforces their dominance and forecloses alternative conceptualisations, interpretations and understandings of the nature, causes and effects of forced labour. Second, the absence of critical reflexivity gives rise to methodological issues that adversely affect research validity, reliability and quality. Third, crucial empirical findings could be distorted or ignored where they contradict conventional discourses, interpretations and frameworks adopted for the research. Oxford University Press LeBaron, Genevieve 2018-01-02 Book Section PeerReviewed Okyere, Samuel (2018) Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery. In: Researching forced labour in the global economy: methodological challenges and advances. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (In Press) Forced labour research; politics; bias; conflation; reflexivity
spellingShingle Forced labour research; politics; bias; conflation; reflexivity
Okyere, Samuel
Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery
title Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery
title_full Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery
title_fullStr Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery
title_full_unstemmed Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery
title_short Confronting bias in NGO research on modern slavery
title_sort confronting bias in ngo research on modern slavery
topic Forced labour research; politics; bias; conflation; reflexivity
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51912/