_version_ 1848798570333863936
author Mantha, Kameswara Bharadwaj
McIntosh, Daniel H.
Brennan, Ryan
Ferguson, Henry C.
Kodra, Dritan
Newman, Jeffrey A.
Rafelski, Marc
Somerville, Rachel S.
Conselice, Christopher J.
Cook, Joshua S.
Hathi, Nimish P.
Koo, David C.
Lotz, Jennifer M.
Simmons, Brooke D.
Straughn, Amber N.
Snyder, Gregory F.
Wuyts, Stijn
Bell, Eric F
Dekel, Avishai
Kartaltepe, Jeyhan
Kocevski, Dale D.
Koekemoer, Anton M.
Lee, Seong-Kook
Lucas, Ray A.
Pacifici, Camilla
Peth, Michael A.
Barro, Guillermo
Dahlen, Tomas
Finkelstein, Steven L.
Fontana, Adriano
Galametz, Audrey
Grogin, Norman A.
Guo, Yicheng
Mobasher, Bahram
Nayyeri, Hooshang
Pérez-González, Pablo G.
Pforr, Janine
Santini, Paola
Stefanon, Mauro
Wiklind, Tommy
author_facet Mantha, Kameswara Bharadwaj
McIntosh, Daniel H.
Brennan, Ryan
Ferguson, Henry C.
Kodra, Dritan
Newman, Jeffrey A.
Rafelski, Marc
Somerville, Rachel S.
Conselice, Christopher J.
Cook, Joshua S.
Hathi, Nimish P.
Koo, David C.
Lotz, Jennifer M.
Simmons, Brooke D.
Straughn, Amber N.
Snyder, Gregory F.
Wuyts, Stijn
Bell, Eric F
Dekel, Avishai
Kartaltepe, Jeyhan
Kocevski, Dale D.
Koekemoer, Anton M.
Lee, Seong-Kook
Lucas, Ray A.
Pacifici, Camilla
Peth, Michael A.
Barro, Guillermo
Dahlen, Tomas
Finkelstein, Steven L.
Fontana, Adriano
Galametz, Audrey
Grogin, Norman A.
Guo, Yicheng
Mobasher, Bahram
Nayyeri, Hooshang
Pérez-González, Pablo G.
Pforr, Janine
Santini, Paola
Stefanon, Mauro
Wiklind, Tommy
author_sort Mantha, Kameswara Bharadwaj
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The rate of major galaxy–galaxy merging is theoretically predicted to steadily increase with redshift during the peak epoch of massive galaxy development (1 ≤ z ≤ 3). We use close-pair statistics to objectively study the incidence of massive galaxies (stellar M1 > 2 × 1010 M⊙) hosting major companions (1 ≤ M1/M2 ≤ 4; i.e. <4:1) at six epochs spanning 0 < z < 3. We select companions from a nearly complete, mass-limited (≥5 × 109 M⊙) sample of 23 696 galaxies in the five Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey fields and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Using 5–50 kpc projected separation and close redshift proximity criteria, we find that the major companion fraction fmc(z) based on stellar mass-ratio (MR) selection increases from 6 per cent (z ∼ 0) to 16 per cent (z ∼ 0.8), then turns over at z ∼ 1 and decreases to 7 per cent (z ∼ 3). Instead, if we use a major F160W flux-ratio (FR) selection, we find that fmc(z) increases steadily until z = 3 owing to increasing contamination from minor (MR > 4:1) companions at z > 1. We show that these evolutionary trends are statistically robust to changes in companion proximity. We find disagreements between published results are resolved when selection criteria are closely matched. If we compute merger rates using constant fraction-to-rate conversion factors (Cmerg,pair = 0.6 and Tobs,pair = 0.65 Gyr), we find that MR rates disagree with theoretical predictions at z > 1.5. Instead, if we use an evolving Tobs,pair(z) ∝ (1 + z)−2 from Snyder et al., our MR-based rates agree with theory at 0 < z < 3. Our analysis underscores the need for detailed calibration of Cmerg,pair and Tobs,pair as a function of redshift, mass, and companion selection criteria to better constrain the empirical major merger history.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:52Z
format Article
id nottingham-51768
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:52Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-517682024-08-15T15:28:02Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51768/ Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0 Mantha, Kameswara Bharadwaj McIntosh, Daniel H. Brennan, Ryan Ferguson, Henry C. Kodra, Dritan Newman, Jeffrey A. Rafelski, Marc Somerville, Rachel S. Conselice, Christopher J. Cook, Joshua S. Hathi, Nimish P. Koo, David C. Lotz, Jennifer M. Simmons, Brooke D. Straughn, Amber N. Snyder, Gregory F. Wuyts, Stijn Bell, Eric F Dekel, Avishai Kartaltepe, Jeyhan Kocevski, Dale D. Koekemoer, Anton M. Lee, Seong-Kook Lucas, Ray A. Pacifici, Camilla Peth, Michael A. Barro, Guillermo Dahlen, Tomas Finkelstein, Steven L. Fontana, Adriano Galametz, Audrey Grogin, Norman A. Guo, Yicheng Mobasher, Bahram Nayyeri, Hooshang Pérez-González, Pablo G. Pforr, Janine Santini, Paola Stefanon, Mauro Wiklind, Tommy The rate of major galaxy–galaxy merging is theoretically predicted to steadily increase with redshift during the peak epoch of massive galaxy development (1 ≤ z ≤ 3). We use close-pair statistics to objectively study the incidence of massive galaxies (stellar M1 > 2 × 1010 M⊙) hosting major companions (1 ≤ M1/M2 ≤ 4; i.e. <4:1) at six epochs spanning 0 < z < 3. We select companions from a nearly complete, mass-limited (≥5 × 109 M⊙) sample of 23 696 galaxies in the five Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey fields and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Using 5–50 kpc projected separation and close redshift proximity criteria, we find that the major companion fraction fmc(z) based on stellar mass-ratio (MR) selection increases from 6 per cent (z ∼ 0) to 16 per cent (z ∼ 0.8), then turns over at z ∼ 1 and decreases to 7 per cent (z ∼ 3). Instead, if we use a major F160W flux-ratio (FR) selection, we find that fmc(z) increases steadily until z = 3 owing to increasing contamination from minor (MR > 4:1) companions at z > 1. We show that these evolutionary trends are statistically robust to changes in companion proximity. We find disagreements between published results are resolved when selection criteria are closely matched. If we compute merger rates using constant fraction-to-rate conversion factors (Cmerg,pair = 0.6 and Tobs,pair = 0.65 Gyr), we find that MR rates disagree with theoretical predictions at z > 1.5. Instead, if we use an evolving Tobs,pair(z) ∝ (1 + z)−2 from Snyder et al., our MR-based rates agree with theory at 0 < z < 3. Our analysis underscores the need for detailed calibration of Cmerg,pair and Tobs,pair as a function of redshift, mass, and companion selection criteria to better constrain the empirical major merger history. Oxford University Press 2018-04-01 Article PeerReviewed Mantha, Kameswara Bharadwaj, McIntosh, Daniel H., Brennan, Ryan, Ferguson, Henry C., Kodra, Dritan, Newman, Jeffrey A., Rafelski, Marc, Somerville, Rachel S., Conselice, Christopher J., Cook, Joshua S., Hathi, Nimish P., Koo, David C., Lotz, Jennifer M., Simmons, Brooke D., Straughn, Amber N., Snyder, Gregory F., Wuyts, Stijn, Bell, Eric F, Dekel, Avishai, Kartaltepe, Jeyhan, Kocevski, Dale D., Koekemoer, Anton M., Lee, Seong-Kook, Lucas, Ray A., Pacifici, Camilla, Peth, Michael A., Barro, Guillermo, Dahlen, Tomas, Finkelstein, Steven L., Fontana, Adriano, Galametz, Audrey, Grogin, Norman A., Guo, Yicheng, Mobasher, Bahram, Nayyeri, Hooshang, Pérez-González, Pablo G., Pforr, Janine, Santini, Paola, Stefanon, Mauro and Wiklind, Tommy (2018) Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475 (2). pp. 1549-1573. ISSN 1365-2966 galaxies: evolution galaxies: high-redshift galaxies: interactions galaxies: statistics https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3260 doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3260 doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3260
spellingShingle galaxies: evolution
galaxies: high-redshift
galaxies: interactions
galaxies: statistics
Mantha, Kameswara Bharadwaj
McIntosh, Daniel H.
Brennan, Ryan
Ferguson, Henry C.
Kodra, Dritan
Newman, Jeffrey A.
Rafelski, Marc
Somerville, Rachel S.
Conselice, Christopher J.
Cook, Joshua S.
Hathi, Nimish P.
Koo, David C.
Lotz, Jennifer M.
Simmons, Brooke D.
Straughn, Amber N.
Snyder, Gregory F.
Wuyts, Stijn
Bell, Eric F
Dekel, Avishai
Kartaltepe, Jeyhan
Kocevski, Dale D.
Koekemoer, Anton M.
Lee, Seong-Kook
Lucas, Ray A.
Pacifici, Camilla
Peth, Michael A.
Barro, Guillermo
Dahlen, Tomas
Finkelstein, Steven L.
Fontana, Adriano
Galametz, Audrey
Grogin, Norman A.
Guo, Yicheng
Mobasher, Bahram
Nayyeri, Hooshang
Pérez-González, Pablo G.
Pforr, Janine
Santini, Paola
Stefanon, Mauro
Wiklind, Tommy
Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0
title Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0
title_full Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0
title_fullStr Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0
title_full_unstemmed Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0
title_short Major merging history in CANDELS. I. Evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0
title_sort major merging history in candels. i. evolution of the incidence of massive galaxy–galaxy pairs from z = 3 to z ∼ 0
topic galaxies: evolution
galaxies: high-redshift
galaxies: interactions
galaxies: statistics
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51768/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51768/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51768/