Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey

Background: Gastrointestinal infection is an important risk factor for developing IBS. Our aim was to characterise postinfectious IBS (PI-IBS) compared to other IBS patients. Methods: An internet survey of IBS patients using Rome III diagnostic questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Card, Timothy, Enck, Paul, Barbara, Giovanni, Boeckxstaens, Guy E.E, Santos, Javier, Azpiroz, Fernando, Mearin, Fermin, Aziz, Qasim, Marshall, John, Spiller, Robin C.
Format: Article
Published: SAGE 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51696/
_version_ 1848798553792577536
author Card, Timothy
Enck, Paul
Barbara, Giovanni
Boeckxstaens, Guy E.E
Santos, Javier
Azpiroz, Fernando
Mearin, Fermin
Aziz, Qasim
Marshall, John
Spiller, Robin C.
author_facet Card, Timothy
Enck, Paul
Barbara, Giovanni
Boeckxstaens, Guy E.E
Santos, Javier
Azpiroz, Fernando
Mearin, Fermin
Aziz, Qasim
Marshall, John
Spiller, Robin C.
author_sort Card, Timothy
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Gastrointestinal infection is an important risk factor for developing IBS. Our aim was to characterise postinfectious IBS (PI-IBS) compared to other IBS patients. Methods: An internet survey of IBS patients using Rome III diagnostic questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-12 somatic symptom score (PHQ12-SS) documenting the mode of onset. Results: 7811 participants, 63.2% female of whom 1004 (13.3%) met criteria for PI-IBS. 70% of PI-IBS described sudden onset, 35% onset while travelling, 49.6% vomiting, 49.9 fever and 20.3% bloody diarrhoea. Compared to other IBS, PI-IBS was significantly associated with living in Northern Europe and North America, having a hysterectomy, not having an appendectomy, higher PHQ12-SS score and having more than one toilet in the family home. PI-IBS patients had more frequent stools. At 1 year recovery rate in PI-IBS and non-PI-IBS group was 19.7% and 22.2%, p=0.15. Recovery rates were lower for females (20.7%) versus males (38.8%), those with somatisation ( 23.0%) versus those without (33.2%) and living in North America or Northern Europe (21.1%) versus living elsewhere (33.9%) p=<0.001. Conclusion: PI-IBS accounts for around 13% of all IBS in this internet sample, with some distinctive features but a similar prognosis to the remainder.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:36Z
format Article
id nottingham-51696
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:36Z
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-516962024-08-15T15:29:00Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51696/ Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey Card, Timothy Enck, Paul Barbara, Giovanni Boeckxstaens, Guy E.E Santos, Javier Azpiroz, Fernando Mearin, Fermin Aziz, Qasim Marshall, John Spiller, Robin C. Background: Gastrointestinal infection is an important risk factor for developing IBS. Our aim was to characterise postinfectious IBS (PI-IBS) compared to other IBS patients. Methods: An internet survey of IBS patients using Rome III diagnostic questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire-12 somatic symptom score (PHQ12-SS) documenting the mode of onset. Results: 7811 participants, 63.2% female of whom 1004 (13.3%) met criteria for PI-IBS. 70% of PI-IBS described sudden onset, 35% onset while travelling, 49.6% vomiting, 49.9 fever and 20.3% bloody diarrhoea. Compared to other IBS, PI-IBS was significantly associated with living in Northern Europe and North America, having a hysterectomy, not having an appendectomy, higher PHQ12-SS score and having more than one toilet in the family home. PI-IBS patients had more frequent stools. At 1 year recovery rate in PI-IBS and non-PI-IBS group was 19.7% and 22.2%, p=0.15. Recovery rates were lower for females (20.7%) versus males (38.8%), those with somatisation ( 23.0%) versus those without (33.2%) and living in North America or Northern Europe (21.1%) versus living elsewhere (33.9%) p=<0.001. Conclusion: PI-IBS accounts for around 13% of all IBS in this internet sample, with some distinctive features but a similar prognosis to the remainder. SAGE 2018-05-23 Article PeerReviewed Card, Timothy, Enck, Paul, Barbara, Giovanni, Boeckxstaens, Guy E.E, Santos, Javier, Azpiroz, Fernando, Mearin, Fermin, Aziz, Qasim, Marshall, John and Spiller, Robin C. (2018) Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey. United European Gastroenterology Journal . ISSN 2050-6414 Infection Irritable bowel syndrome Survey Multinational Diarrhoea http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2050640618779923 doi:10.1177/2050640618779923 doi:10.1177/2050640618779923
spellingShingle Infection
Irritable bowel syndrome
Survey
Multinational
Diarrhoea
Card, Timothy
Enck, Paul
Barbara, Giovanni
Boeckxstaens, Guy E.E
Santos, Javier
Azpiroz, Fernando
Mearin, Fermin
Aziz, Qasim
Marshall, John
Spiller, Robin C.
Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey
title Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey
title_full Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey
title_fullStr Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey
title_full_unstemmed Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey
title_short Post infectious IBS: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey
title_sort post infectious ibs: defining its clinical features and prognosis using an internet-based survey
topic Infection
Irritable bowel syndrome
Survey
Multinational
Diarrhoea
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51696/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51696/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51696/