Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews
Background: Cumulative anticholinergic exposure (anticholinergic burden) has been linked to a number of adverse outcomes. To conduct research in this area, an agreed approach to describing anticholinergic burden is needed. Objective: This review set out to identify anticholinergic burden scales, to...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer
2018
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51695/ |
| _version_ | 1848798553486393344 |
|---|---|
| author | Welsh, Tomas J. van der Wardt, Veronika Ojo, Grace Gordon, Adam L. Gladman, John R.F. |
| author_facet | Welsh, Tomas J. van der Wardt, Veronika Ojo, Grace Gordon, Adam L. Gladman, John R.F. |
| author_sort | Welsh, Tomas J. |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Background: Cumulative anticholinergic exposure (anticholinergic burden) has been linked to a number of adverse outcomes. To conduct research in this area, an agreed approach to describing anticholinergic burden is needed.
Objective: This review set out to identify anticholinergic burden scales, to describe their rationale, the settings in which they have been used and the outcomes associated with them.
Methods: A search was performed using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2016 to identify systematic reviews describing anticholinergic burden scales or tools. Abstracts and titles were reviewed to determine eligibility for review with eligible articles read in full. The final selection of reviews was critically appraised using the ROBIS tool and pre-defined data were extracted; the primary data of interest were the anticholinergic burden scales or tools used.
Results: Five reviews were identified for analysis containing a total of 62 original articles. Eighteen anticholinergic burden scales or tools were identified with variation in their derivation, content and how they quantified the anticholinergic activity of medications. The Drug Burden Index was the most commonly used scale or tool in community and database studies, while the Anticholinergic Risk Scale was used more frequently in care homes and hospital settings. The association between anticholinergic burden and clinical outcomes varied by index and study. Falls and hospitalisation were consistently found to be associated with anticholinergic burden. Mortality, delirium, physical function and cognition were not consistently associated.
Conclusions: Anticholinergic burden scales vary in their rationale, use and association with outcomes. This review showed that the concept of anticholinergic burden has been variably defined and inconsistently described using a number of indices with different content and scoring. The association between adverse outcomes and anticholinergic burden varies between scores and has not been conclusively established. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:21:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-51695 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:21:36Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Springer |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-516952020-05-04T19:35:44Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51695/ Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews Welsh, Tomas J. van der Wardt, Veronika Ojo, Grace Gordon, Adam L. Gladman, John R.F. Background: Cumulative anticholinergic exposure (anticholinergic burden) has been linked to a number of adverse outcomes. To conduct research in this area, an agreed approach to describing anticholinergic burden is needed. Objective: This review set out to identify anticholinergic burden scales, to describe their rationale, the settings in which they have been used and the outcomes associated with them. Methods: A search was performed using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2016 to identify systematic reviews describing anticholinergic burden scales or tools. Abstracts and titles were reviewed to determine eligibility for review with eligible articles read in full. The final selection of reviews was critically appraised using the ROBIS tool and pre-defined data were extracted; the primary data of interest were the anticholinergic burden scales or tools used. Results: Five reviews were identified for analysis containing a total of 62 original articles. Eighteen anticholinergic burden scales or tools were identified with variation in their derivation, content and how they quantified the anticholinergic activity of medications. The Drug Burden Index was the most commonly used scale or tool in community and database studies, while the Anticholinergic Risk Scale was used more frequently in care homes and hospital settings. The association between anticholinergic burden and clinical outcomes varied by index and study. Falls and hospitalisation were consistently found to be associated with anticholinergic burden. Mortality, delirium, physical function and cognition were not consistently associated. Conclusions: Anticholinergic burden scales vary in their rationale, use and association with outcomes. This review showed that the concept of anticholinergic burden has been variably defined and inconsistently described using a number of indices with different content and scoring. The association between adverse outcomes and anticholinergic burden varies between scores and has not been conclusively established. Springer 2018-05-08 Article PeerReviewed Welsh, Tomas J., van der Wardt, Veronika, Ojo, Grace, Gordon, Adam L. and Gladman, John R.F. (2018) Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews. Drugs & Aging . ISSN 1170-229X https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40266-018-0549-z doi:10.1007/s40266-018-0549-z doi:10.1007/s40266-018-0549-z |
| spellingShingle | Welsh, Tomas J. van der Wardt, Veronika Ojo, Grace Gordon, Adam L. Gladman, John R.F. Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews |
| title | Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews |
| title_full | Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews |
| title_fullStr | Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews |
| title_short | Anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews |
| title_sort | anticholinergic drug burden tools/scales and adverse outcomes in different clinical settings: a systematic review of reviews |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51695/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51695/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51695/ |