The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape

There is a longstanding dispute between criminal justice professionals on the one hand and researchers and commentators on the other regarding the prevalence of false allegations of rape. Prevalence, however, is contingent upon definition. If the various protagonists’ definitions of a ‘false allegat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saunders, Candida L.
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51636/
_version_ 1848798538149920768
author Saunders, Candida L.
author_facet Saunders, Candida L.
author_sort Saunders, Candida L.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description There is a longstanding dispute between criminal justice professionals on the one hand and researchers and commentators on the other regarding the prevalence of false allegations of rape. Prevalence, however, is contingent upon definition. If the various protagonists’ definitions of a ‘false allegation’ do not coincide, it is virtually inevitable that their estimates will diverge. Drawing on original empirical data from in-depth research interviews conducted with police and Crown Prosecutors, this article explores the following important but much neglected question: When criminal justice professionals tell us that false allegations of rape are common, what precisely are they talking about? What ‘counts’ as a false allegation?
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:21Z
format Article
id nottingham-51636
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:21Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-516362020-05-04T16:34:13Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51636/ The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape Saunders, Candida L. There is a longstanding dispute between criminal justice professionals on the one hand and researchers and commentators on the other regarding the prevalence of false allegations of rape. Prevalence, however, is contingent upon definition. If the various protagonists’ definitions of a ‘false allegation’ do not coincide, it is virtually inevitable that their estimates will diverge. Drawing on original empirical data from in-depth research interviews conducted with police and Crown Prosecutors, this article explores the following important but much neglected question: When criminal justice professionals tell us that false allegations of rape are common, what precisely are they talking about? What ‘counts’ as a false allegation? Oxford University Press 2012-11-01 Article PeerReviewed Saunders, Candida L. (2012) The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape. British Journal of Criminology, 52 (6). pp. 1152-1171. ISSN 0007-0955 false allegations rape prevalence no-criming witness veracity credibility https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/52/6/1152/347356 doi:10.1093/bjc/azs036 doi:10.1093/bjc/azs036
spellingShingle false allegations
rape
prevalence
no-criming
witness veracity
credibility
Saunders, Candida L.
The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape
title The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape
title_full The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape
title_fullStr The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape
title_full_unstemmed The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape
title_short The truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape
title_sort truth, the half-truth, and nothing like the truth: reconceptualizing false allegations of rape
topic false allegations
rape
prevalence
no-criming
witness veracity
credibility
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51636/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51636/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51636/