Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review

Consultations are complex interactions, are central to achieving optimal outcomes for all stakeholders, yet what constitutes a successful consultation has not been defined. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the scope of the literature available on specific health problem consultation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corah, Louise, Mossop, Liz, Cobb, Kate, Dean, Rachel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51623/
_version_ 1848798535032504320
author Corah, Louise
Mossop, Liz
Cobb, Kate
Dean, Rachel
author_facet Corah, Louise
Mossop, Liz
Cobb, Kate
Dean, Rachel
author_sort Corah, Louise
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Consultations are complex interactions, are central to achieving optimal outcomes for all stakeholders, yet what constitutes a successful consultation has not been defined. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the scope of the literature available on specific health problem consultations and appraise their identified success measures. Searches of CAB Abstracts and MEDLINE were performed in May 2016 using species and consultation terms. Systematic sorting of the results allowed identification of consultation ‘success factors’ cited in peer-reviewed veterinary literature which were appraised using an appropriate critical appraisal tool (AXIS). Searches returned 11 330 results with a total of 17 publications meeting the inclusion criteria, of which four measured consultation success. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association was the most common journal of publication (9 of 17) and the majority of included papers had been published since 2010 (12 of 17). Success factors measured were compliance, client satisfaction and veterinary surgeon satisfaction, and publications primarily used communication analysis tools to measure success. The review highlights the paucity of peer-reviewed literature examining small animal, health problem veterinary consultations. The available evidence is of variable quality and provides weak evidence as to which factors contribute to a successful consultation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:19Z
format Article
id nottingham-51623
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:21:19Z
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-516232018-05-09T06:15:32Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51623/ Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review Corah, Louise Mossop, Liz Cobb, Kate Dean, Rachel Consultations are complex interactions, are central to achieving optimal outcomes for all stakeholders, yet what constitutes a successful consultation has not been defined. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the scope of the literature available on specific health problem consultations and appraise their identified success measures. Searches of CAB Abstracts and MEDLINE were performed in May 2016 using species and consultation terms. Systematic sorting of the results allowed identification of consultation ‘success factors’ cited in peer-reviewed veterinary literature which were appraised using an appropriate critical appraisal tool (AXIS). Searches returned 11 330 results with a total of 17 publications meeting the inclusion criteria, of which four measured consultation success. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association was the most common journal of publication (9 of 17) and the majority of included papers had been published since 2010 (12 of 17). Success factors measured were compliance, client satisfaction and veterinary surgeon satisfaction, and publications primarily used communication analysis tools to measure success. The review highlights the paucity of peer-reviewed literature examining small animal, health problem veterinary consultations. The available evidence is of variable quality and provides weak evidence as to which factors contribute to a successful consultation. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-03-15 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51623/1/vr.104759.full.pdf Corah, Louise, Mossop, Liz, Cobb, Kate and Dean, Rachel (2018) Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review. Veterinary Record . ISSN 2042-7670 http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/early/2018/03/15/vr.104759 doi:10.1136/vr.104759 doi:10.1136/vr.104759
spellingShingle Corah, Louise
Mossop, Liz
Cobb, Kate
Dean, Rachel
Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review
title Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review
title_full Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review
title_fullStr Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review
title_short Measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review
title_sort measuring the success of specific health problem consultations in cats and dogs: a systematic review
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51623/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51623/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51623/