Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation

Climate change adaptation refers to altering infrastructure, institutions or ecosystems to respond to the impacts of climate change. Least developed countries often lack the requisite capacity to implement adaptation projects. The Global Environment Facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sovacool, Benjamin K., Tan-Mullins, May, Ockwell, David, Newell, Peter
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51029/
_version_ 1848798396572237824
author Sovacool, Benjamin K.
Tan-Mullins, May
Ockwell, David
Newell, Peter
author_facet Sovacool, Benjamin K.
Tan-Mullins, May
Ockwell, David
Newell, Peter
author_sort Sovacool, Benjamin K.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Climate change adaptation refers to altering infrastructure, institutions or ecosystems to respond to the impacts of climate change. Least developed countries often lack the requisite capacity to implement adaptation projects. The Global Environment Facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) is a scheme where industrialised countries have disbursed $934.5 million in voluntary contributions to support 213 adaptation projects across 51 least developed countries. But how effective are its efforts—and what sort of challenges have arisen as it implements projects? To provide some answers, this article documents the presence of four “political economy” attributes of adaptation projects—processes we have termed enclosure, exclusion, encroachment and entrenchment—cutting across economic, political, ecological and social dimensions. Based on extensive field research, we find the four processes at work simultaneously in our case studies of five LDCF projects being implemented in Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, the Maldives and Vanuatu. The article concludes with a discussion of the broader implications of the political economy of adaptation for analysts, program managers and climate researchers at large. In sum, the politics of adaptation must be taken into account so that projects can maximise their efficacy and avoid marginalising those most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:19:06Z
format Article
id nottingham-51029
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:19:06Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-510292020-05-04T18:35:01Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51029/ Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation Sovacool, Benjamin K. Tan-Mullins, May Ockwell, David Newell, Peter Climate change adaptation refers to altering infrastructure, institutions or ecosystems to respond to the impacts of climate change. Least developed countries often lack the requisite capacity to implement adaptation projects. The Global Environment Facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) is a scheme where industrialised countries have disbursed $934.5 million in voluntary contributions to support 213 adaptation projects across 51 least developed countries. But how effective are its efforts—and what sort of challenges have arisen as it implements projects? To provide some answers, this article documents the presence of four “political economy” attributes of adaptation projects—processes we have termed enclosure, exclusion, encroachment and entrenchment—cutting across economic, political, ecological and social dimensions. Based on extensive field research, we find the four processes at work simultaneously in our case studies of five LDCF projects being implemented in Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, the Maldives and Vanuatu. The article concludes with a discussion of the broader implications of the political economy of adaptation for analysts, program managers and climate researchers at large. In sum, the politics of adaptation must be taken into account so that projects can maximise their efficacy and avoid marginalising those most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. Taylor & Francis 2017-02-13 Article PeerReviewed Sovacool, Benjamin K., Tan-Mullins, May, Ockwell, David and Newell, Peter (2017) Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation. Third World Quarterly, 38 (6). pp. 1249-1271. ISSN 1360-2241 Political economy; political ecology; resilience; vulnerability; adaptive capacity; climate change https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01436597.2017.1282816 doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1282816 doi:10.1080/01436597.2017.1282816
spellingShingle Political economy; political ecology; resilience; vulnerability; adaptive capacity; climate change
Sovacool, Benjamin K.
Tan-Mullins, May
Ockwell, David
Newell, Peter
Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation
title Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation
title_full Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation
title_fullStr Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation
title_short Political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) for climate change adaptation
title_sort political economy, poverty, and polycentrism in the global environment facility’s least developed countries fund (ldcf) for climate change adaptation
topic Political economy; political ecology; resilience; vulnerability; adaptive capacity; climate change
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51029/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51029/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51029/