Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens

This article addresses the formalist-substantivist controversy in ancient economic history by bringing two new approaches to bear on it. On the one hand, it critiques the formalist approach (which relies on assumptions about economically rational behaviour) by examining critiques of neo-classical ec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lewis, David
Other Authors: Canevaro, Mirko
Format: Book Section
Published: Edinburgh University Press 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50760/
_version_ 1848798333718495232
author Lewis, David
author2 Canevaro, Mirko
author_facet Canevaro, Mirko
Lewis, David
author_sort Lewis, David
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This article addresses the formalist-substantivist controversy in ancient economic history by bringing two new approaches to bear on it. On the one hand, it critiques the formalist approach (which relies on assumptions about economically rational behaviour) by examining critiques of neo-classical economics from the behaviouralist school. This shows that even modern economic actors are constrained in their capacity for rational behaviour by cognitive and emotional factors; a fortiori, we cannot expect Olympian rationality in antiquity. On the substantivist side, it reaffirms the importance of embeddedness, but uses Granovetter's view of embeddeness instead of Polanyi's. It also critiques the Finleyan reading of social values in ancient Greece that allegedly prevented economic growth and profit-oriented behaviour.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:18:07Z
format Book Section
id nottingham-50760
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:18:07Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Edinburgh University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-507602020-05-04T19:40:50Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50760/ Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens Lewis, David This article addresses the formalist-substantivist controversy in ancient economic history by bringing two new approaches to bear on it. On the one hand, it critiques the formalist approach (which relies on assumptions about economically rational behaviour) by examining critiques of neo-classical economics from the behaviouralist school. This shows that even modern economic actors are constrained in their capacity for rational behaviour by cognitive and emotional factors; a fortiori, we cannot expect Olympian rationality in antiquity. On the substantivist side, it reaffirms the importance of embeddedness, but uses Granovetter's view of embeddeness instead of Polanyi's. It also critiques the Finleyan reading of social values in ancient Greece that allegedly prevented economic growth and profit-oriented behaviour. Edinburgh University Press Canevaro, Mirko Gray, Ben Erskine, Andrew Ober, Josiah 2018-06-15 Book Section PeerReviewed Lewis, David (2018) Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens. In: Ancient Greek history and contemporary social science. Edinburgh Leventis studies . Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 15-46. ISBN 9781474421775 https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-ancient-greek-history-and-contemporary-social-science-hb.html
spellingShingle Lewis, David
Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens
title Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens
title_full Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens
title_fullStr Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens
title_full_unstemmed Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens
title_short Behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical Athens
title_sort behavioural economics and economic behaviour in classical athens
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50760/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50760/