Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up

Background: In a feasibility trial of early occupational therapy vocational rehabilitation (VR), more VR participants were in work at 12 months compared to those who received usual NHS rehabilitation after stroke (UC) (11 [65%] v 6 [35%]) (Radford et al., 2013). However, the longer-term is unknown...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phillips, Julie
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: College of Occupational Therapists 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50605/
_version_ 1848798294492315648
author Phillips, Julie
author_facet Phillips, Julie
author_sort Phillips, Julie
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: In a feasibility trial of early occupational therapy vocational rehabilitation (VR), more VR participants were in work at 12 months compared to those who received usual NHS rehabilitation after stroke (UC) (11 [65%] v 6 [35%]) (Radford et al., 2013). However, the longer-term is unknown. Aim: To follow up and explore work status six years post stroke. Method: Postal questionnaires measuring employment, income, mood, functional ability and quality of life (QoL) were sent to participants in an earlier feasibility trial by the lead stroke clinician. Respondents were invited to participate in interviews exploring working six years after stroke. Ethical and HRA approvals obtained (REC 16/EM/0423) Results: Of 48 identified participants, five (10.4%) had died; 19/43 (44.2%) responded. Fourteen were men; mean age 62 (24-78) years. Respondents classified themselves as in paid work 10/19 (53%), voluntary work 3/19 (16%), full time education 1/19 (5%) and solely retired 5/19 (26%). Six respondents were working over the age of 65 (26.3%). Most remained with preinjury employers (11/13). Half (8/15 53%) reported a decrease in income since stroke. Compared to one year, mean functional ability improved marginally from 56.6 (SD 12) to 59.4 (SD 9) but quality of life reduced from mean 77.4 (SD 11) vs 70.7 (SD14). Six interviewees felt working was the correct decision but lacked support with invisible impairments (fatigue, memory) which impacted workability. Conclusion: Work remains important to stroke survivors. Vocational rehabilitation should address hidden disabilities. Response bias may have influenced these findings.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:17:29Z
format Article
id nottingham-50605
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:17:29Z
publishDate 2018
publisher College of Occupational Therapists
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-506052018-06-10T18:25:38Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50605/ Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up Phillips, Julie Background: In a feasibility trial of early occupational therapy vocational rehabilitation (VR), more VR participants were in work at 12 months compared to those who received usual NHS rehabilitation after stroke (UC) (11 [65%] v 6 [35%]) (Radford et al., 2013). However, the longer-term is unknown. Aim: To follow up and explore work status six years post stroke. Method: Postal questionnaires measuring employment, income, mood, functional ability and quality of life (QoL) were sent to participants in an earlier feasibility trial by the lead stroke clinician. Respondents were invited to participate in interviews exploring working six years after stroke. Ethical and HRA approvals obtained (REC 16/EM/0423) Results: Of 48 identified participants, five (10.4%) had died; 19/43 (44.2%) responded. Fourteen were men; mean age 62 (24-78) years. Respondents classified themselves as in paid work 10/19 (53%), voluntary work 3/19 (16%), full time education 1/19 (5%) and solely retired 5/19 (26%). Six respondents were working over the age of 65 (26.3%). Most remained with preinjury employers (11/13). Half (8/15 53%) reported a decrease in income since stroke. Compared to one year, mean functional ability improved marginally from 56.6 (SD 12) to 59.4 (SD 9) but quality of life reduced from mean 77.4 (SD 11) vs 70.7 (SD14). Six interviewees felt working was the correct decision but lacked support with invisible impairments (fatigue, memory) which impacted workability. Conclusion: Work remains important to stroke survivors. Vocational rehabilitation should address hidden disabilities. Response bias may have influenced these findings. College of Occupational Therapists 2018-03-19 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50605/1/UKOTRF%20Key%20findings%20J%20Phillips%20final.pdf application/pdf en https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50605/7/Revised%20UKOTRF%20Report%20-%20accepted%20final%20version%2015.1.2018.pdf Phillips, Julie (2018) Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up. UK Occupational Therapy Research Funding . Neurological practice Occupational therapy Long term conditions https://www.rcot.co.uk/sites/default/files/UKOTRF%20Key%20findings%20J%20Phillips%20final_0.pdf
spellingShingle Neurological practice
Occupational therapy
Long term conditions
Phillips, Julie
Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up
title Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up
title_full Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up
title_fullStr Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up
title_short Return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up
title_sort return to work after stroke: feasibility six year follow-up
topic Neurological practice
Occupational therapy
Long term conditions
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50605/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50605/