Efficiency versus equality in bargaining

We consider how the outcome of bargaining varies with changes in the trade-off between equality, efficiency, and total-earnings maximization. We observe that subjects avoid an equal-earnings outcome if it is Pareto inefficient; a large proportion of bargaining pairs avoid an equal and Pareto efficie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Galeotti, Fabio, Montero, Maria, Poulsen, Anders
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50482/
_version_ 1848798262096560128
author Galeotti, Fabio
Montero, Maria
Poulsen, Anders
author_facet Galeotti, Fabio
Montero, Maria
Poulsen, Anders
author_sort Galeotti, Fabio
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description We consider how the outcome of bargaining varies with changes in the trade-off between equality, efficiency, and total-earnings maximization. We observe that subjects avoid an equal-earnings outcome if it is Pareto inefficient; a large proportion of bargaining pairs avoid an equal and Pareto efficient outcome in favor of one giving unequal and total-earnings maximizing payoffs, and this proportion increases when unequal outcomes imply larger earnings to one of the players, even though this also implies higher inequality; finally, we document a compromise effect that violates the independence of irrelevant alternatives condition.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:16:58Z
format Article
id nottingham-50482
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:16:58Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-504822020-05-04T19:40:20Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50482/ Efficiency versus equality in bargaining Galeotti, Fabio Montero, Maria Poulsen, Anders We consider how the outcome of bargaining varies with changes in the trade-off between equality, efficiency, and total-earnings maximization. We observe that subjects avoid an equal-earnings outcome if it is Pareto inefficient; a large proportion of bargaining pairs avoid an equal and Pareto efficient outcome in favor of one giving unequal and total-earnings maximizing payoffs, and this proportion increases when unequal outcomes imply larger earnings to one of the players, even though this also implies higher inequality; finally, we document a compromise effect that violates the independence of irrelevant alternatives condition. Oxford University Press 2018-06-13 Article PeerReviewed Galeotti, Fabio, Montero, Maria and Poulsen, Anders (2018) Efficiency versus equality in bargaining. Journal of the European Economic Association . ISSN 1542-4774 bargaining efficiency equality communication experiment independence of irrelevant alternatives https://academic.oup.com/jeea/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jeea/jvy030/5088947 doi:10.1093/jeea/jvy030 doi:10.1093/jeea/jvy030
spellingShingle bargaining
efficiency
equality
communication
experiment
independence of irrelevant alternatives
Galeotti, Fabio
Montero, Maria
Poulsen, Anders
Efficiency versus equality in bargaining
title Efficiency versus equality in bargaining
title_full Efficiency versus equality in bargaining
title_fullStr Efficiency versus equality in bargaining
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency versus equality in bargaining
title_short Efficiency versus equality in bargaining
title_sort efficiency versus equality in bargaining
topic bargaining
efficiency
equality
communication
experiment
independence of irrelevant alternatives
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50482/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50482/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50482/