Does observability affect prosociality?
The observation of behaviour is a key theoretical parameter underlying a number of models of prosociality. However, the empirical findings showing the effect of observability on prosociality are mixed. In this meta-analysis, we explore the boundary conditions that may account for this variability, b...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Royal Society
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50337/ |
| _version_ | 1848798225182490624 |
|---|---|
| author | Bradley, Alex Lawrence, Claire Ferguson, Eamonn |
| author_facet | Bradley, Alex Lawrence, Claire Ferguson, Eamonn |
| author_sort | Bradley, Alex |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The observation of behaviour is a key theoretical parameter underlying a number of models of prosociality. However, the empirical findings showing the effect of observability on prosociality are mixed. In this meta-analysis, we explore the boundary conditions that may account for this variability, by exploring key theoretical and methodological moderators of this link. We identified 117 papers yielding 134 study level effects (Total N = 788, 164) and found a small but statistically significant, positive association between observability and prosociality (r = .141, 95% CI = .106, .175). Moderator analysis showed that observability produced stronger effects on prosociality (1) in the presence of passive observers (i.e., people whose role was to only observe participants) vs perceptions of being watched, (2) when participants decisions were consequential (vs non-consequential), (3) when the studies were performed in the laboratory (as opposed to in the field/online), (4) when studies used repeated measures (instead of single games) and (5) when studies involved social dilemmas (instead of bargaining games). These effects show the conditions under which observability effects on prosociality will be maximally observed. We describe the theoretical and practical significance of 14 these results. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:16:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-50337 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:16:23Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Royal Society |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-503372020-05-08T12:00:25Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50337/ Does observability affect prosociality? Bradley, Alex Lawrence, Claire Ferguson, Eamonn The observation of behaviour is a key theoretical parameter underlying a number of models of prosociality. However, the empirical findings showing the effect of observability on prosociality are mixed. In this meta-analysis, we explore the boundary conditions that may account for this variability, by exploring key theoretical and methodological moderators of this link. We identified 117 papers yielding 134 study level effects (Total N = 788, 164) and found a small but statistically significant, positive association between observability and prosociality (r = .141, 95% CI = .106, .175). Moderator analysis showed that observability produced stronger effects on prosociality (1) in the presence of passive observers (i.e., people whose role was to only observe participants) vs perceptions of being watched, (2) when participants decisions were consequential (vs non-consequential), (3) when the studies were performed in the laboratory (as opposed to in the field/online), (4) when studies used repeated measures (instead of single games) and (5) when studies involved social dilemmas (instead of bargaining games). These effects show the conditions under which observability effects on prosociality will be maximally observed. We describe the theoretical and practical significance of 14 these results. Royal Society 2018-03-28 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50337/8/20180116.full.pdf Bradley, Alex, Lawrence, Claire and Ferguson, Eamonn (2018) Does observability affect prosociality? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285 (1875). 20180116/1-20180116/8. ISSN 1471-2954 (In Press) Visibility Prosocial Cost Signalling Theory Indirect Reciprocity Competitive Altruism http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/285/1875/20180116 doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0116 doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0116 |
| spellingShingle | Visibility Prosocial Cost Signalling Theory Indirect Reciprocity Competitive Altruism Bradley, Alex Lawrence, Claire Ferguson, Eamonn Does observability affect prosociality? |
| title | Does observability affect prosociality? |
| title_full | Does observability affect prosociality? |
| title_fullStr | Does observability affect prosociality? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does observability affect prosociality? |
| title_short | Does observability affect prosociality? |
| title_sort | does observability affect prosociality? |
| topic | Visibility Prosocial Cost Signalling Theory Indirect Reciprocity Competitive Altruism |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50337/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50337/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50337/ |