Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks

The relationship between structure and function in the human brain is well established, but not yet well characterised. Large-scale biophysical models allow us to investigate this relationship, by leveraging structural information (e.g. derived from diffusion tractography) in order to couple dynamic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hadida, Jonathan, Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N., Abeysuriya, Romesh G., Woolrich, Mark W., Jbabdi, Saad
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50089/
_version_ 1848798150363447296
author Hadida, Jonathan
Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
Abeysuriya, Romesh G.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Jbabdi, Saad
author_facet Hadida, Jonathan
Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
Abeysuriya, Romesh G.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Jbabdi, Saad
author_sort Hadida, Jonathan
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The relationship between structure and function in the human brain is well established, but not yet well characterised. Large-scale biophysical models allow us to investigate this relationship, by leveraging structural information (e.g. derived from diffusion tractography) in order to couple dynamical models of local neuronal activity into networks of interacting regions distributed across the cortex. In practice however, these models are difficult to parametrise, and their simulation is often delicate and computationally expensive. This undermines the experimental aspect of scientific modelling, and stands in the way of comparing different parametrisations, network architectures, or models in general, with confidence. Here, we advocate the use of Bayesian optimisation for assessing the capabilities of biophysical network models, given a set of desired properties (e.g. band-specific functional connectivity); and in turn the use of this assessment as a principled basis for incremental modelling and model comparison. We adapt an optimisation method designed to cope with costly, high-dimensional, non-convex problems, and demonstrate its use and effectiveness. Using five parameters controlling key aspects of our model, we find that this method is able to converge to regions of high functional similarity with real MEG data, with very few samples given the number of parameters, without getting stuck in local extrema, and while building and exploiting a map of uncertainty defined smoothly across the parameter space. We compare the results obtained using different methods of structural connectivity estimation from diffusion tractography, and find that one method leads to better simulations.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:15:12Z
format Article
id nottingham-50089
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:15:12Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-500892020-05-04T19:43:26Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50089/ Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks Hadida, Jonathan Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N. Abeysuriya, Romesh G. Woolrich, Mark W. Jbabdi, Saad The relationship between structure and function in the human brain is well established, but not yet well characterised. Large-scale biophysical models allow us to investigate this relationship, by leveraging structural information (e.g. derived from diffusion tractography) in order to couple dynamical models of local neuronal activity into networks of interacting regions distributed across the cortex. In practice however, these models are difficult to parametrise, and their simulation is often delicate and computationally expensive. This undermines the experimental aspect of scientific modelling, and stands in the way of comparing different parametrisations, network architectures, or models in general, with confidence. Here, we advocate the use of Bayesian optimisation for assessing the capabilities of biophysical network models, given a set of desired properties (e.g. band-specific functional connectivity); and in turn the use of this assessment as a principled basis for incremental modelling and model comparison. We adapt an optimisation method designed to cope with costly, high-dimensional, non-convex problems, and demonstrate its use and effectiveness. Using five parameters controlling key aspects of our model, we find that this method is able to converge to regions of high functional similarity with real MEG data, with very few samples given the number of parameters, without getting stuck in local extrema, and while building and exploiting a map of uncertainty defined smoothly across the parameter space. We compare the results obtained using different methods of structural connectivity estimation from diffusion tractography, and find that one method leads to better simulations. Elsevier 2018-07-01 Article PeerReviewed Hadida, Jonathan, Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N., Abeysuriya, Romesh G., Woolrich, Mark W. and Jbabdi, Saad (2018) Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks. NeuroImage, 174 . pp. 219-236. ISSN 1095-9572 Biophysical model; Simulation Bayesian optimisation; Resting-state; Diffusion; MEG https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811918301708 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.063 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.063
spellingShingle Biophysical model; Simulation
Bayesian optimisation; Resting-state; Diffusion; MEG
Hadida, Jonathan
Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N.
Abeysuriya, Romesh G.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Jbabdi, Saad
Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks
title Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks
title_full Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks
title_fullStr Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks
title_short Bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks
title_sort bayesian optimization of large-scale biophysical networks
topic Biophysical model; Simulation
Bayesian optimisation; Resting-state; Diffusion; MEG
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50089/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50089/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/50089/