Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway

Background: Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the investigation of iron defciency anaemia remains a common procedure, but is expensive and time-consuming. Serological investigation for coeliac disease is also recommended, having excellent a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herrod, Philip, Lund, Jonathan N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Verlag 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49958/
_version_ 1848798119926431744
author Herrod, Philip
Lund, Jonathan N.
author_facet Herrod, Philip
Lund, Jonathan N.
author_sort Herrod, Philip
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the investigation of iron defciency anaemia remains a common procedure, but is expensive and time-consuming. Serological investigation for coeliac disease is also recommended, having excellent accuracy with the added beneft of lower cost. This study sought to examine the utility of duodenal biopsy and coeliac serology in the diagnosis of coeliac disease. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was interrogated to identify all patients having upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the investigation of anaemia between January 01, 2016, and December 31, 2016. Results Of the 1131 patients having an endoscopy, coeliac serology was measured in only 412 (36%) and was positive in 9 cases (2%), leading to 6 histological diagnoses of coeliac disease and 3 false positives. Two-hundred and seventy-four patients with negative serology had biopsies taken which were all negative. Only 2/451 (0.4%) patients who had biopsies performed in the absence of a serology test were histologically positive for coeliac disease. The cost per diagnosis of a case of coeliac disease in those with either negative or absent coeliac serology was £18,839 (US$25,244, €21,196). Conclusions: Random duodenal biopsy is not a cost-efective method of diagnosing coeliac disease and should be replaced with pre-endoscopy coeliac serology.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:14:43Z
format Article
id nottingham-49958
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:14:43Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Verlag
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-499582018-04-10T14:23:10Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49958/ Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway Herrod, Philip Lund, Jonathan N. Background: Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the investigation of iron defciency anaemia remains a common procedure, but is expensive and time-consuming. Serological investigation for coeliac disease is also recommended, having excellent accuracy with the added beneft of lower cost. This study sought to examine the utility of duodenal biopsy and coeliac serology in the diagnosis of coeliac disease. Methods: A prospectively maintained database was interrogated to identify all patients having upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the investigation of anaemia between January 01, 2016, and December 31, 2016. Results Of the 1131 patients having an endoscopy, coeliac serology was measured in only 412 (36%) and was positive in 9 cases (2%), leading to 6 histological diagnoses of coeliac disease and 3 false positives. Two-hundred and seventy-four patients with negative serology had biopsies taken which were all negative. Only 2/451 (0.4%) patients who had biopsies performed in the absence of a serology test were histologically positive for coeliac disease. The cost per diagnosis of a case of coeliac disease in those with either negative or absent coeliac serology was £18,839 (US$25,244, €21,196). Conclusions: Random duodenal biopsy is not a cost-efective method of diagnosing coeliac disease and should be replaced with pre-endoscopy coeliac serology. Springer Verlag 2018-02-23 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49958/8/10.1007%252Fs10151-018-1756-7.pdf Herrod, Philip and Lund, Jonathan N. (2018) Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway. Techniques in Coloproctology, 22 (2). pp. 121-124. ISSN 1128-045X Celiac Disease; Serologic Tests; Endoscopy; Anemia Iron-Deficiency; biopsy https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10151-018-1756-7 doi:10.1007/s10151-018-1756-7 doi:10.1007/s10151-018-1756-7
spellingShingle Celiac Disease; Serologic Tests; Endoscopy; Anemia
Iron-Deficiency; biopsy
Herrod, Philip
Lund, Jonathan N.
Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway
title Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway
title_full Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway
title_fullStr Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway
title_full_unstemmed Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway
title_short Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway
title_sort random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost‑efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre‑endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway
topic Celiac Disease; Serologic Tests; Endoscopy; Anemia
Iron-Deficiency; biopsy
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49958/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49958/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49958/