Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’
Background: Reality television shows are popular with children and young adults; inclusion of tobacco imagery in these programmes is likely to cause smoking in these groups. Series 3 of the UK reality show Love Island, broadcast in 2017, attracted widespread media criticism for high levels of smokin...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49863/ |
| _version_ | 1848798096626024448 |
|---|---|
| author | Barker, Alexander B. Opazo-Breton, Magdalena Cranwell, Joanne Britton, John Murray, Rachel L. |
| author_facet | Barker, Alexander B. Opazo-Breton, Magdalena Cranwell, Joanne Britton, John Murray, Rachel L. |
| author_sort | Barker, Alexander B. |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Background: Reality television shows are popular with children and young adults; inclusion of tobacco imagery in these programmes is likely to cause smoking in these groups. Series 3 of the UK reality show Love Island, broadcast in 2017, attracted widespread media criticism for high levels of smoking depicted. We have quantified this tobacco content and estimated the UK population exposure to generic and branded tobacco imagery generated by the show.
Methods: We used 1-minute interval coding to quantify actual or implied tobacco use, tobacco paraphernalia or branding, in alternate episodes of series 3 of Love Island; and Census data and viewing figures from Kantar Media to estimate gross and per capita tobacco impressions.
Results: We coded 21 episodes comprising 1001 minutes of content. Tobacco imagery occurred in 204 (20%) intervals; the frequency of appearances fell significantly after media criticism. An identifiable cigarette brand, Lucky Strike Double Click, appeared in 16 intervals. The 21 episodes delivered an estimated 559 million gross tobacco impressions to the UK population, predominantly to women, including 47 million to children aged <16; and 44 million gross impressions of Lucky Strike branding, including 4 million to children <16.
Conclusion: Despite advertising legislation and broadcasting regulations intended to protect children from smoking imagery in UK television, series 3 of Love Island delivered millions of general and branded tobacco impressions both to children and adults in the UK. More stringent controls on tobacco content in television programmes are urgently needed. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:14:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-49863 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:14:20Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-498632024-08-15T15:26:30Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49863/ Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’ Barker, Alexander B. Opazo-Breton, Magdalena Cranwell, Joanne Britton, John Murray, Rachel L. Background: Reality television shows are popular with children and young adults; inclusion of tobacco imagery in these programmes is likely to cause smoking in these groups. Series 3 of the UK reality show Love Island, broadcast in 2017, attracted widespread media criticism for high levels of smoking depicted. We have quantified this tobacco content and estimated the UK population exposure to generic and branded tobacco imagery generated by the show. Methods: We used 1-minute interval coding to quantify actual or implied tobacco use, tobacco paraphernalia or branding, in alternate episodes of series 3 of Love Island; and Census data and viewing figures from Kantar Media to estimate gross and per capita tobacco impressions. Results: We coded 21 episodes comprising 1001 minutes of content. Tobacco imagery occurred in 204 (20%) intervals; the frequency of appearances fell significantly after media criticism. An identifiable cigarette brand, Lucky Strike Double Click, appeared in 16 intervals. The 21 episodes delivered an estimated 559 million gross tobacco impressions to the UK population, predominantly to women, including 47 million to children aged <16; and 44 million gross impressions of Lucky Strike branding, including 4 million to children <16. Conclusion: Despite advertising legislation and broadcasting regulations intended to protect children from smoking imagery in UK television, series 3 of Love Island delivered millions of general and branded tobacco impressions both to children and adults in the UK. More stringent controls on tobacco content in television programmes are urgently needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02-05 Article PeerReviewed Barker, Alexander B., Opazo-Breton, Magdalena, Cranwell, Joanne, Britton, John and Murray, Rachel L. (2018) Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’. Tobacco Control, 27 . pp. 709-711. ISSN 1468-3318 https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/27/6/709 doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054125 doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054125 |
| spellingShingle | Barker, Alexander B. Opazo-Breton, Magdalena Cranwell, Joanne Britton, John Murray, Rachel L. Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’ |
| title | Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’ |
| title_full | Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’ |
| title_fullStr | Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’ |
| title_full_unstemmed | Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’ |
| title_short | Population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the UK reality show ‘Love Island’ |
| title_sort | population exposure to smoking and tobacco branding in the uk reality show ‘love island’ |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49863/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49863/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49863/ |