Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background: A meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has recently been published. On balance, no significant differences were found in terms of objective response and overall survival. The impact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fateen, Waleed, Khan, Farooq, O’Neill, Richard, James, Martin, Ryder, Stephen, Aithal, Guruprasad
Format: Article
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49862/
_version_ 1848798096330326016
author Fateen, Waleed
Khan, Farooq
O’Neill, Richard
James, Martin
Ryder, Stephen
Aithal, Guruprasad
author_facet Fateen, Waleed
Khan, Farooq
O’Neill, Richard
James, Martin
Ryder, Stephen
Aithal, Guruprasad
author_sort Fateen, Waleed
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: A meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has recently been published. On balance, no significant differences were found in terms of objective response and overall survival. The impact on healthcare costs had been studied in small series based on a hypothetical model and was in favor of DEB-TACE. We aimed to evaluate and compare healthcare costs and effectiveness of both modalities in a cohort of patients from Nottingham, UK. Methods: Using a dedicated radiology database, we identified all patients who had undergone cTACE or DEB-TACE between 2006 and 2012 at a single tertiary referral center based in Nottingham. We collected clinical data, including treatment response, postprocedure complications and 30-day mortality. Costing models were constructed to present both our local hospital perspective as well as the national health service position. Results: During our study period, 101 procedures were performed on 43 patients (76 cTACE procedures on 26 patients and 25 DEB-TACE procedures on 17 patients). Overall, 11/26 in cTACE and 5/17 in DEB-TACE group had progressive disease (p=0.52). Adverse events were seen in 6/76 cTACE compared with 7/25 DEB-TACE group (p=0.16). Based on the predetermined standard pathway there was an unadjusted average cost difference of £3770.30 (TACE =£9070.44, DEB-TACE =£5300.14) in favor of the DEB-TACE. Results from our costing models indicated a £2715.33 (95% CI £580.88–4849.77) cost difference in favor of the same procedure. Conclusions: Even when the extra costs of DEB-TACE were considered, the overall treatment costs per patient were lower in relation to cTACE.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:14:20Z
format Article
id nottingham-49862
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:14:20Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-498622020-05-04T19:12:54Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49862/ Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma Fateen, Waleed Khan, Farooq O’Neill, Richard James, Martin Ryder, Stephen Aithal, Guruprasad Background: A meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has recently been published. On balance, no significant differences were found in terms of objective response and overall survival. The impact on healthcare costs had been studied in small series based on a hypothetical model and was in favor of DEB-TACE. We aimed to evaluate and compare healthcare costs and effectiveness of both modalities in a cohort of patients from Nottingham, UK. Methods: Using a dedicated radiology database, we identified all patients who had undergone cTACE or DEB-TACE between 2006 and 2012 at a single tertiary referral center based in Nottingham. We collected clinical data, including treatment response, postprocedure complications and 30-day mortality. Costing models were constructed to present both our local hospital perspective as well as the national health service position. Results: During our study period, 101 procedures were performed on 43 patients (76 cTACE procedures on 26 patients and 25 DEB-TACE procedures on 17 patients). Overall, 11/26 in cTACE and 5/17 in DEB-TACE group had progressive disease (p=0.52). Adverse events were seen in 6/76 cTACE compared with 7/25 DEB-TACE group (p=0.16). Based on the predetermined standard pathway there was an unadjusted average cost difference of £3770.30 (TACE =£9070.44, DEB-TACE =£5300.14) in favor of the DEB-TACE. Results from our costing models indicated a £2715.33 (95% CI £580.88–4849.77) cost difference in favor of the same procedure. Conclusions: Even when the extra costs of DEB-TACE were considered, the overall treatment costs per patient were lower in relation to cTACE. Dove Medical Press 2017-10-16 Article PeerReviewed Fateen, Waleed, Khan, Farooq, O’Neill, Richard, James, Martin, Ryder, Stephen and Aithal, Guruprasad (2017) Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, 2017 (4). pp. 123-130. ISSN 2253-5969 hepatocellular carcinoma transarterial chemoembolization healthcare costs drug-eluting beads objective response https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S144068 doi:10.2147/JHC.S144068 doi:10.2147/JHC.S144068
spellingShingle hepatocellular carcinoma
transarterial chemoembolization
healthcare costs
drug-eluting beads
objective response
Fateen, Waleed
Khan, Farooq
O’Neill, Richard
James, Martin
Ryder, Stephen
Aithal, Guruprasad
Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
topic hepatocellular carcinoma
transarterial chemoembolization
healthcare costs
drug-eluting beads
objective response
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49862/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49862/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49862/