New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males

The aim of the current study was to develop, test, and re-test two new male body dissatisfaction scales: The Male Body Scale (MBS; consisting of emaciated to obese figures) and the Male Fit Body Scale (MFBS; consisting of emaciated to muscular figures). These scales were compared to the two most com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ralph-Nearman, Christina, Filik, Ruth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49052/
_version_ 1848797911974936576
author Ralph-Nearman, Christina
Filik, Ruth
author_facet Ralph-Nearman, Christina
Filik, Ruth
author_sort Ralph-Nearman, Christina
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The aim of the current study was to develop, test, and re-test two new male body dissatisfaction scales: The Male Body Scale (MBS; consisting of emaciated to obese figures) and the Male Fit Body Scale (MFBS; consisting of emaciated to muscular figures). These scales were compared to the two most commonly used visually-based indices of body dissatisfaction (Stunkard Figure Rating Scale, SFRS; and Somatomorphic Matrix, SM). Male participants rated which body figure on each scale most represented their current figure, then their ideal figure, and then rated which one of the three scales (MBS, MFBS, and SFRS) best represented their current and ideal body overall. Finally, they completed the Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS), the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0), and their actual body composition was calculated. This was followed by a re-test and manipulation check two to six weeks later. Participants’ actual body mass index, fat- and muscularity-percentage were all highly related to their current body figure choice, and both new scales were consistently valid and more reliable between test and re-test than the SFRS and SM body dissatisfaction scores. Importantly, each scale was sensitive to different types of body dissatisfaction within males. Specifically, the MBS revealed that males’ desire for the thin-ideal significantly corresponded to higher eating disorder tendencies as identified by EDE-Q 6.0 scores, whilst the MFBS revealed much higher body dissatisfaction toward the larger, muscularity-ideal, predicting higher drive for muscularity as identified by DMS scores. Results validated the new scales, and inform male-focused eating disorder research.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:11:24Z
format Article
id nottingham-49052
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:11:24Z
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-490522018-03-24T14:45:55Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49052/ New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males Ralph-Nearman, Christina Filik, Ruth The aim of the current study was to develop, test, and re-test two new male body dissatisfaction scales: The Male Body Scale (MBS; consisting of emaciated to obese figures) and the Male Fit Body Scale (MFBS; consisting of emaciated to muscular figures). These scales were compared to the two most commonly used visually-based indices of body dissatisfaction (Stunkard Figure Rating Scale, SFRS; and Somatomorphic Matrix, SM). Male participants rated which body figure on each scale most represented their current figure, then their ideal figure, and then rated which one of the three scales (MBS, MFBS, and SFRS) best represented their current and ideal body overall. Finally, they completed the Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS), the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0), and their actual body composition was calculated. This was followed by a re-test and manipulation check two to six weeks later. Participants’ actual body mass index, fat- and muscularity-percentage were all highly related to their current body figure choice, and both new scales were consistently valid and more reliable between test and re-test than the SFRS and SM body dissatisfaction scores. Importantly, each scale was sensitive to different types of body dissatisfaction within males. Specifically, the MBS revealed that males’ desire for the thin-ideal significantly corresponded to higher eating disorder tendencies as identified by EDE-Q 6.0 scores, whilst the MFBS revealed much higher body dissatisfaction toward the larger, muscularity-ideal, predicting higher drive for muscularity as identified by DMS scores. Results validated the new scales, and inform male-focused eating disorder research. SAGE 2018-03-20 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by_nc https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49052/8/1557988318763516.pdf Ralph-Nearman, Christina and Filik, Ruth (2018) New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males. American Journal of Men's Health . ISSN 1557-9891 male body dissatisfaction; thin-ideal; eating disorders; body image; muscularity http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1557988318763516 doi:10.1177/1557988318763516 doi:10.1177/1557988318763516
spellingShingle male body dissatisfaction; thin-ideal; eating disorders; body image; muscularity
Ralph-Nearman, Christina
Filik, Ruth
New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males
title New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males
title_full New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males
title_fullStr New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males
title_full_unstemmed New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males
title_short New body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males
title_sort new body scales reveal body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and muscularity-ideal in males
topic male body dissatisfaction; thin-ideal; eating disorders; body image; muscularity
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49052/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49052/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49052/