Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review

Background: There is a need for greater understanding of the epidemiology of primary care patient safety in order to generate solutions to prevent future harm. Aim: To estimate the rate of failures in processing actions requested in hospital discharge summaries and to determine factors associated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Spencer, Rachel, Spencer, Simon E.F., Rodgers, Sarah, Campbell, Stephen, Avery, Anthony
Format: Article
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49004/
_version_ 1848797900397608960
author Spencer, Rachel
Spencer, Simon E.F.
Rodgers, Sarah
Campbell, Stephen
Avery, Anthony
author_facet Spencer, Rachel
Spencer, Simon E.F.
Rodgers, Sarah
Campbell, Stephen
Avery, Anthony
author_sort Spencer, Rachel
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: There is a need for greater understanding of the epidemiology of primary care patient safety in order to generate solutions to prevent future harm. Aim: To estimate the rate of failures in processing actions requested in hospital discharge summaries and to determine factors associated with these failures. Design and setting: We undertook a retrospective records review. Our study population was emergency admissions for patients aged ≥75 years, drawn from ten practices in three areas of England. Method: One GP researcher reviewed the records for 300 patients after hospital discharge to determine the rate of compliance with actions requested in the discharge summary and to estimate the rate of associated harm from non-compliance. Where GPs documented decision making contrary to what was requested, these instances did not constitute failures. Data were also collected on time taken to process discharge communications. Results: There were failures in processing actions requested in 46% (112/246) of discharge summaries (CI 39-52%). Medications changes were not made in 17% (124/750) of requests (CI 14-19%). Tests were not completed for 25% of requests (CI 16-34%) and 27% of requested follow-ups were not arranged (CI 20-33%). The harm rate associated with these failures was 8%. Increased risk of failure to process test requests was significantly associated with the type of clinical IT system and male patients. Conclusion: Failures occurred in the processing of requested actions in almost half of all discharge summaries, and with all types of action requested. Associated harms were uncommon and most were of moderate severity.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:11:13Z
format Article
id nottingham-49004
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:11:13Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-490042020-05-04T19:41:36Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49004/ Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review Spencer, Rachel Spencer, Simon E.F. Rodgers, Sarah Campbell, Stephen Avery, Anthony Background: There is a need for greater understanding of the epidemiology of primary care patient safety in order to generate solutions to prevent future harm. Aim: To estimate the rate of failures in processing actions requested in hospital discharge summaries and to determine factors associated with these failures. Design and setting: We undertook a retrospective records review. Our study population was emergency admissions for patients aged ≥75 years, drawn from ten practices in three areas of England. Method: One GP researcher reviewed the records for 300 patients after hospital discharge to determine the rate of compliance with actions requested in the discharge summary and to estimate the rate of associated harm from non-compliance. Where GPs documented decision making contrary to what was requested, these instances did not constitute failures. Data were also collected on time taken to process discharge communications. Results: There were failures in processing actions requested in 46% (112/246) of discharge summaries (CI 39-52%). Medications changes were not made in 17% (124/750) of requests (CI 14-19%). Tests were not completed for 25% of requests (CI 16-34%) and 27% of requested follow-ups were not arranged (CI 20-33%). The harm rate associated with these failures was 8%. Increased risk of failure to process test requests was significantly associated with the type of clinical IT system and male patients. Conclusion: Failures occurred in the processing of requested actions in almost half of all discharge summaries, and with all types of action requested. Associated harms were uncommon and most were of moderate severity. Royal College of General Practitioners 2018-06-18 Article PeerReviewed Spencer, Rachel, Spencer, Simon E.F., Rodgers, Sarah, Campbell, Stephen and Avery, Anthony (2018) Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review. British Journal of General Practice . ISSN 1478-5242 Patient safety; General practice; Care transition; Patient discharge http://bjgp.org/content/early/2018/06/18/bjgp18X697877 doi:10.3399/bjgp18X697877 doi:10.3399/bjgp18X697877
spellingShingle Patient safety; General practice; Care transition; Patient discharge
Spencer, Rachel
Spencer, Simon E.F.
Rodgers, Sarah
Campbell, Stephen
Avery, Anthony
Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review
title Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review
title_full Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review
title_fullStr Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review
title_full_unstemmed Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review
title_short Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review
title_sort processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review
topic Patient safety; General practice; Care transition; Patient discharge
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49004/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49004/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/49004/