Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs

There is little peer-reviewed research assessing therapeutic effectiveness in canine eye disease. Current treatments used in first opinion and ophthalmology referral practices are also somewhat poorly documented. The aim of this study was to investigate the current management of canine keratoconjunc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: White, C.N., Downes, Martin J., Jones, G., Wigfall, C., Dean, Rachel S., Brennan, Marnie L.
Format: Article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48820/
_version_ 1848797855980978176
author White, C.N.
Downes, Martin J.
Jones, G.
Wigfall, C.
Dean, Rachel S.
Brennan, Marnie L.
author_facet White, C.N.
Downes, Martin J.
Jones, G.
Wigfall, C.
Dean, Rachel S.
Brennan, Marnie L.
author_sort White, C.N.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description There is little peer-reviewed research assessing therapeutic effectiveness in canine eye disease. Current treatments used in first opinion and ophthalmology referral practices are also somewhat poorly documented. The aim of this study was to investigate the current management of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) and acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) by veterinary surgeons. Questionnaires using clinical vignettes were administered to a cross section of general practitioners (‘GPs’) and veterinarians engaged in or training for postgraduate ophthalmology practice (’PGs’). Similar treatment recommendations for KCS (topical cyclosporine, lubricant, antibiotic) were given by both groups of veterinarians with the single exception of increased topical antibiotic use by GPs. Treatment of acute glaucoma diverged between groups: PGs were much more likely to recommend topical prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) and a wider array of both topical and systemic treatments were recommended by both groups. Systemic ocular hypotensive agents were suggested infrequently. Our results suggest that treatments may vary substantially in ocular conditions, particularly in conditions for which neither guidelines nor high quality evidence exists. This study highlights the need for novel strategies to address evidence gaps in veterinary medicine, as well as for better evaluation and dissemination of current treatment experience.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:10:31Z
format Article
id nottingham-48820
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:10:31Z
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-488202020-05-04T19:25:57Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48820/ Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs White, C.N. Downes, Martin J. Jones, G. Wigfall, C. Dean, Rachel S. Brennan, Marnie L. There is little peer-reviewed research assessing therapeutic effectiveness in canine eye disease. Current treatments used in first opinion and ophthalmology referral practices are also somewhat poorly documented. The aim of this study was to investigate the current management of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) and acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) by veterinary surgeons. Questionnaires using clinical vignettes were administered to a cross section of general practitioners (‘GPs’) and veterinarians engaged in or training for postgraduate ophthalmology practice (’PGs’). Similar treatment recommendations for KCS (topical cyclosporine, lubricant, antibiotic) were given by both groups of veterinarians with the single exception of increased topical antibiotic use by GPs. Treatment of acute glaucoma diverged between groups: PGs were much more likely to recommend topical prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) and a wider array of both topical and systemic treatments were recommended by both groups. Systemic ocular hypotensive agents were suggested infrequently. Our results suggest that treatments may vary substantially in ocular conditions, particularly in conditions for which neither guidelines nor high quality evidence exists. This study highlights the need for novel strategies to address evidence gaps in veterinary medicine, as well as for better evaluation and dissemination of current treatment experience. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-06 Article PeerReviewed White, C.N., Downes, Martin J., Jones, G., Wigfall, C., Dean, Rachel S. and Brennan, Marnie L. (2018) Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs. Veterinary Record, 182 (1). p. 21. ISSN 2042-7670 http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/182/1/21 doi:10.1136/vr.104390 doi:10.1136/vr.104390
spellingShingle White, C.N.
Downes, Martin J.
Jones, G.
Wigfall, C.
Dean, Rachel S.
Brennan, Marnie L.
Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs
title Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs
title_full Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs
title_fullStr Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs
title_short Use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs
title_sort use of clinical vignette questionnaires to investigate the variation in management of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and acute glaucoma in dogs
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48820/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48820/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48820/