The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production
Monitoring the sensory consequences of articulatory movements supports speaking. For example, delaying auditory feedback of a speaker's voice disrupts speech production. Also, there is evidence that this disruption may be decreased by immediate visual feedback, i.e., seeing one's own artic...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Acoustical Society of America
2015
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48522/ |
| _version_ | 1848797783215046656 |
|---|---|
| author | Chesters, Jennifer Baghai-Ravary, Ladan Möttönen, Riikka |
| author_facet | Chesters, Jennifer Baghai-Ravary, Ladan Möttönen, Riikka |
| author_sort | Chesters, Jennifer |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Monitoring the sensory consequences of articulatory movements supports speaking. For example, delaying auditory feedback of a speaker's voice disrupts speech production. Also, there is evidence that this disruption may be decreased by immediate visual feedback, i.e., seeing one's own articulatory movements. It is, however, unknown whether delayed visual feedback affects speech production in fluent speakers. Here, the effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech fluency (i.e., speech rate and errors), vocal control (i.e., intensity and pitch), and speech rhythm were investigated. Participants received delayed (by 200 ms) or immediate auditory feedback, while repeating sentences. Moreover, they received either no visual feedback, immediate visual feedback, or delayed visual feedback (by 200, 400, and 600 ms). Delayed auditory feedback affected fluency, vocal control, and rhythm. Immediate visual feedback had no effect on any of the speech measures when it was combined with delayed auditory feedback. Delayed visual feedback did, however, affect speech fluency when it was combined with delayed auditory feedback. In sum, the findings show that delayed auditory feedback disrupts fluency, vocal control, and rhythm and that delayed visual feedback can strengthen the disruptive effect of delayed auditory feedback on fluency. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:09:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-48522 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:09:22Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Acoustical Society of America |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-485222020-05-04T20:10:00Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48522/ The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production Chesters, Jennifer Baghai-Ravary, Ladan Möttönen, Riikka Monitoring the sensory consequences of articulatory movements supports speaking. For example, delaying auditory feedback of a speaker's voice disrupts speech production. Also, there is evidence that this disruption may be decreased by immediate visual feedback, i.e., seeing one's own articulatory movements. It is, however, unknown whether delayed visual feedback affects speech production in fluent speakers. Here, the effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech fluency (i.e., speech rate and errors), vocal control (i.e., intensity and pitch), and speech rhythm were investigated. Participants received delayed (by 200 ms) or immediate auditory feedback, while repeating sentences. Moreover, they received either no visual feedback, immediate visual feedback, or delayed visual feedback (by 200, 400, and 600 ms). Delayed auditory feedback affected fluency, vocal control, and rhythm. Immediate visual feedback had no effect on any of the speech measures when it was combined with delayed auditory feedback. Delayed visual feedback did, however, affect speech fluency when it was combined with delayed auditory feedback. In sum, the findings show that delayed auditory feedback disrupts fluency, vocal control, and rhythm and that delayed visual feedback can strengthen the disruptive effect of delayed auditory feedback on fluency. Acoustical Society of America 2015-02 Article PeerReviewed Chesters, Jennifer, Baghai-Ravary, Ladan and Möttönen, Riikka (2015) The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137 (2). pp. 873-883. ISSN 1520-8524 http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4906266 doi:10.1121/1.4906266 doi:10.1121/1.4906266 |
| spellingShingle | Chesters, Jennifer Baghai-Ravary, Ladan Möttönen, Riikka The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production |
| title | The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production |
| title_full | The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production |
| title_fullStr | The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production |
| title_short | The effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production |
| title_sort | effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on speech production |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48522/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48522/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48522/ |